Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Village Recreation Club vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 3638 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3638 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

The Village Recreation Club vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2025

Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M.Nagaprasanna
                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:2347
                                                         WP No. 100683 of 2025




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                         DHARWAD BENCH

                             DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

                           WRIT PETITION NO.100683 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE)

                      BETWEEN:

                      THE VILLAGE RECREATION CLUB,
                      LOKAPURA, TQ. MUDHOL,
                      DIST. BAGALKOT - 587 122,
                      R/BY ITS CHAIRMAN,
                      SRI ANANDA S/O. KALLAPA GAGGARI,
                      AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
                      OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: HANDIGUNDA,
                      TQ: RAIBAG,
                      DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 235.
                                                                     ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI SHRIKANT T. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by
VISHAL                AND:
NINGAPPA
PATTIHAL
Location: High
Court of Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench,        1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Dharwad
                           R/BY ITS SECRETARY,
                           DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
                           VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                           BENGALURU - 560 001.

                      2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                           BAGALKOT,
                           TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOT - 587 103.

                      3.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                           BAGALKOT,
                           TQ. AND DIST. BAGALKOT - 587 103.
                               -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC-D:2347
                                      WP No. 100683 of 2025




4.    THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
      RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI POLICE STATION,
      RABAKAVI,
      TQ. RABAKAVI-BANAHATTI,
      DIST. BAGALKOT - 587 301.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHARD V. MAGADUM, AGA)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO,
ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER
ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE, DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 4 TOR HEREIN NOT TO INTERFERE
WITH THE DAY-TO-DAY AFFAIRS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE
PETITIONER CLUB, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

                      ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction

by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing

the respondents-Police to restrain from interfering with the

activities of the petitioner-Club.

2. Heard Sri Shrikant T. Patil, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Sri Sharad V.Magadum, learned AGA for

the respondents.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2347

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner - Club has not undertaken any

such illegal activity for interference. He would also submit

that the issue is covered by plethora of judgments

rendered by this Court. Though the petitioner -

Association is abiding with the terms and conditions as

directed by this Court, the respondents - Police are

insisting to obtain licence, which is contrary to law.

4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this

case, I deem it appropriate to refer to the order passed by

the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in

W.P.No.12241/2018, disposed on 27.03.2018, wherein it

has held as follows:

"3. The issue which has been raised in the instant petition has already been considered by this Court in W.P.No.30071/2014 dated 15.10.2014 (The Media N Members Club vs. State of Karnataka and Others) wherein the petition was disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein games are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days' period shall be made available by

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2347

the petitioner to the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so.

(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity cards to all its members, which shall be produced by the members, when called upon by the concerned police, during the raids, surveillance, etc.

(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-

member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s), to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of game(s) or recreational activities.

(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its members, by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Sections 2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any games of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of the Act. The members shall not be allowed to play any kind of games with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.

(v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no games are played in any unlawful manner by the members. If the jurisdictional police find the game/s played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.

(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner's premises.

(vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner's - Club/Association.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2347

(viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the members of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.

This writ petition is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms."

5. In the light of the issue standing covered by the

judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

(supra), on all its fours and on the same reasons, the

subject petition also stands disposed.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

KGK/CT-ASC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter