Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mudasir @ Mudda vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 10870 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10870 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2025

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mudasir @ Mudda vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 December, 2025

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                                  -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC:49745
                                                         CRL.P No. 14923 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                               CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14923 OF 2025
                                     (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS))


                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   MUDASIR @ MUDDA
                           S/O APSAR KHAN
                           AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
                           RAVI EXTENSION,
                           R/AT #48, 4TH CROSS,
                           NANDINI LAYOUT,
                           BENGALURU-560096.

                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. MANJUNATH M R.,ADVOCATE)


Digitally signed by   AND:
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH        1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                  BY NANDINI LAYOUT P.S,
                           BENGALURU.
                           REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                           HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                           BENGALURU-560001.


                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SMT.B PUSHPALATHA, ADDL.SPP)
                            -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC:49745
                                   CRL.P No. 14923 of 2025


HC-KAR




     THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON
BAIL IN CR.NO.400/2019 IN ITS S.C NO.1554/2024
REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 399 AND 402 OF IPC BY NANDINI LAYOUT P.S,
BENGALURU PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE PRL.CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE CCH-1 AT BENGALURU.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

                       ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused No.5 under Section

483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying

to grant bail in Crime No.400/2019 of Nandini Layout

Police Station pending in SC No.1554/2024 on the file of

the learned Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, CCH-1

Bengaluru registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 399 and 402 of IPC.

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the

learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for

respondent/State.

NC: 2025:KHC:49745

HC-KAR

3. The learned counsel for petitioner would

contend that, the petitioner was earlier granted bail at

crime stage in the year 2019. Subsequently, the case

came to be split up, and accused Nos.2, 3 and 4 have

been acquitted in SC No.1023/2022 by judgment dated

02.09.2025. The case against the petitioner has been split

up, and now pending in SC No.1554/2024. The petitioner

remained absent and he has been secured by executing

NBW on 21.09.2025, and since then, he is in judicial

custody. The petitioner undertakes to appear before the

Trial court on all dates of hearing, and cooperate for

speedy disposal of the case. The petitioner has deposited a

sum of Rs.25,000/- towards forfeited bond amount of

Rs.50,000/-. With this, he prayed to allow the petition.

4. The learned Additional State Public Prosecutor

would contend that, due to the absence of the petitioner,

the case registered against him has been split up, and

there is no progress in the split up case as the petitioner

remained absent. If he is again granted bail, he will again

NC: 2025:KHC:49745

HC-KAR

remain absent, and it will cause hindrance in disposal of

the case. With this, she prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsel, the Court

has perused the materials placed on record.

6. The petitioner is accused No.5 in Crime

No.400/2019 of Nandini Layout Police Station registered

for the offences under Sections 399 and 402 of IPC. The

petitioner has been granted bail in the year 2019.

Subsequently, the petitioner could not appear in SC

No.1023/2022, and therefore, the case against him has

been split up, and now pending in SC No.1554/2024. The

petitioner remained absent, and to secure his presence,

NBW has been issued. The NBW against the petitioner has

been executed, and he has been secured on 21.09.2025,

and since then, he is in judicial custody. The petitioner has

undertaken to appear before the Trial Court on all dates of

hearing, unless exempted, and cooperate for speedy

disposal of the case. The petitioner has also deposited a

NC: 2025:KHC:49745

HC-KAR

sum of Rs.25,000/- towards forfeited bond amount of

Rs.50,000/-, and the same can be appropriated to the

State.

7. Considering the above aspects, the petitioner

has made out a case for grant of bail with conditions.

In the result, the following:

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The petitioner is granted bail in SC

No.1554/2024 (Crime No.400/2019 of Nandini Layout

Police Station) pending on the file of the learned Principal

City Civil and Sessions Judge CCH-1, Bengaluru registered

for the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of

IPC subject to following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

NC: 2025:KHC:49745

HC-KAR

b) The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly.

c) The petitioner shall attend the Trial Court on all dates of hearing, unless exempted and co- operate for speedy disposal of the case.

The amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the

petitioner shall be appropriated to the State towards

forfeite bond amount.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

BKM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter