Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Branch Manager United India ... vs Aneesa W/O Akeel Shaikh
2024 Latest Caselaw 22650 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22650 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Branch Manager United India ... vs Aneesa W/O Akeel Shaikh on 5 September, 2024

Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

                                             -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705
                                                   MFA No. 202359 of 2017
                                               C/W MFA No. 201156 of 2016
                                                   MFA No. 201157 of 2016
                                                             AND 1 OTHER




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

                                           BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA


                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 202359 OF 2017 (MV-I)
                                            C/W
                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 201156 OF 2016(MV-I)
                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 201157 OF 2016(MV-I)
                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 202360 OF 2017(MV-I)


                   IN MFA NO.202359/2017:-

                   BETWEEN:

                   REHAN S/O AKEEL SHAIKH,
Digitally signed   AGE: 12 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
by SUMITRA         M/G BY AKEEL S/O HASHIMSAB SHIKH,
SHERIGAR
                   AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF           R/O. NEW VIDHI GURUKUL KUMBARI SOLAPUR
KARNATAKA          NOW RESIDING AT SHAIKH COLONY,
                   VIJAYAPUR.

                                                             ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   MOULALI S/O CHANDSAB PATVEKAR,
                        AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
                        R/O. 130 SAKHAR PETH,
                                -2-
                                          NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705
                                     MFA No. 202359 of 2017
                                 C/W MFA No. 201156 of 2016
                                     MFA No. 201157 of 2016
                                               AND 1 OTHER


     SOLPAUR-413007.

2.   THE BRANCH MANAGER
     UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
     VIJAYAPUR-586101

3.   NASIR SHAH S/O MOHAMMED TAMBOLI
     AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. YAVALI, TQ: MOHOL,
     SOLAPUR-413007.


                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANVENDRA REDDY, ADV FOR R2;
    NOTICE TO R1 AND R3 ARE DISPENSED WITH)

      THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO,
ALLOW THE APPEAL BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD     DATED   25.04.2016     PASSED   BY    THE    MACT-IV,
VIJAYAPUR IN MVC NO.1105/2012 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE
PLEASED    TO     ENHANCE      THE    COMPENSATION        FROM
RS.3,88,800/- TO RS.5,50,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 12% PER
ANNUM     FROM    THE   DATE    OF   PETITION   TILL    ACTUAL
REALIZATION AND ETC.



IN MFA NO.201156/2016:-

BETWEEN:

THE BRANCH MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
SANGAM BUILDING 1ST FLOOR,
S.S. FRONT ROAD, VIJAYAPUR-586101
                                                  ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANVENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
                              -3-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705
                                   MFA No. 202359 of 2017
                               C/W MFA No. 201156 of 2016
                                   MFA No. 201157 of 2016
                                             AND 1 OTHER


AND:
1.   REHAN S/O AKEEL SHAIKH,
     AGE: 11 YEARS (MINOR),
     UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS NATURAL FATHER
     SRI. AKEEL S/O HASHIMSAB SHAIK,
     R/O. NEW VIDHI GURUKUL KUMBARI, SOLAPUR
     NOW RESIDING AT SHAIKH COLONY,
     VIJAYAPUR.
2.   MOULALI S/O CHANDSAB PATVEKAR,
     AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. 130, SAKHAR PETH, SOLPAUR-413007.

3.   NASIR SHAH S/O MOHAMMED TAMBOLI
     AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. YAVALI, TQ: MOHOL,
     DIST. SOLAPUR-413007.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADV FOR R1;
    NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 ARE HELD SUFFICIENT)

       THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO,
CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED 25.04.2016 PASSED BY THE MACT NO.IV,
VIJAYAPUR IN MVC NO.1105/2012 BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL
AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC.

IN MFA NO.201157/2016:-

BETWEEN:

THE BRANCH MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
SANGAM BUILDING 1ST FLOOR,
S.S. FRONT ROAD,
VIJAYAPUR-586101
                                               ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANVENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
                              -4-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705
                                   MFA No. 202359 of 2017
                               C/W MFA No. 201156 of 2016
                                   MFA No. 201157 of 2016
                                             AND 1 OTHER


AND:

1.   ANEESA W/O AKEEL SHAIKH
     AGED: 29 YEARS, OCC: TAILOR,
     R/O. NEW VIHDI GURUKUL, KUMBARI,
     SOLAPUR, NOW RESIDING
     AT SHAIKH COLONY,
     VIJAYAPURA-586101.

2.   MOULALI S/O CHANDSAB PATVEKAR,
     AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. 130, SAKHAR PETH, SOLPAUR-413007.

3.   NASIR SHAH S/O MOHAMMED TAMBOLI
     AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. YAVALI, TQ: MOHOL,
     DIST. SOLAPUR-413007.


                                            ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADV FOR R1;
    NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 ARE HELD SUFFICIENT)


       THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO,
CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED 25.04.2016 PASSED BY THE MACT NO.IV,
VIJAYAPUR IN MVC NO.1106/2012 BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL
AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC.


IN MFA NO.202360/2017:-

BETWEEN:

ANEESA W/O AKEEL SHAIKH
AGED: 30 YEARS, OCC: TAILOR,
R/O. NEW VIHDI GURUKUL, KUMBARI,
                            -5-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705
                                 MFA No. 202359 of 2017
                             C/W MFA No. 201156 of 2016
                                 MFA No. 201157 of 2016
                                           AND 1 OTHER


SOLAPUR, NOW RESIDING AT
SHAIKH COLONY,
VIJAYAPURA-586101.

                                               ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SANGANAGOUDA V. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   MOULALI S/O CHANDSAB PATVEKAR,
     AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. 130 SAKHAR PETH, SOLPAUR-413007.

2.   THE BRANCH MANAGER
     UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
     VIJAYAPUR-586101

3.   NASIR SHAH S/O MOHAMMED TAMBOLI
     AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
     R/O. YAVALI, TQ: MOHOL, SOLAPUR-413007.

                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MANVENDRA REDDY, ADV FOR R2;
    NOTICE TO R1 AND R3 ARE DISPENSED WITH)


     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO,
ALLOW THE APPEAL BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED 25.04.2016 PASSED BY THE MACT-IV,
VIJAYAPUR IN MVC NO.1106/2012 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE
PLEASED TO ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION FROM RS.10,000/-
TO RS.5,50,000/- WITH INTEREST @ 12% PER ANNUM FROM
THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ACTUAL REALIZATION AND ETC.

     THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                  -6-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705
                                       MFA No. 202359 of 2017
                                   C/W MFA No. 201156 of 2016
                                       MFA No. 201157 of 2016
                                                 AND 1 OTHER


CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                    ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA)

The Insurer as well as the claimants are in appeal

challenging the award passed by the Tribunal by which a

sum of `3,88,800/- and a sum of `10,000/- is awarded to

the claimants.

2. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that the

evidence on record proved that the accident occurred due

to the fault of the driver of the auto rickshaw bearing

No.MH-13/AF-0457.

3. However, the dispute raised is that rickshaw

Trolley bearing reg.No.MH-13/R-9096 was involved in the

accident and not the auto bearing Reg.No.MH-13/AF-0457.

4. The case of the claimants was that they were

travelling in the auto rickshaw bearing Reg.No.MH-13/AF-

0457. However, the claim of the owner was that according

to the complaint lodged, the claimants were travelling in

an auto Trolley bearing Reg.No.MH-13/R-9096 and

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705

AND 1 OTHER

therefore the claimants could proceed only against the

owner of auto Trolley bearing Reg.No.MH-13/R-9096. The

Insurance Company also took-up the plea that the vehicle

bearing No.MH-13/AF-0457 was not involved in the

accident and the averments of the claimants that they are

travelling in the said auto Trolley was incorrect. The

Insurer also took-up the plea that the driver of the auto

Trolley bearing Reg.No.MH-13/R-9096 was responsible for

the accident and the claimants were required to go against

the owner and driver of the said vehicle bearing No.MH-

13/R-9096 since they were travelling in that vehicle.

5. In the light of the stand taken by the owner and

the Insurer and the contention advanced by the claimants,

it is clear that there is a serious dispute as to the vehicle

in which the claimants were travelling and the vehicle

which was involved in the accident.

6. To compound this difficulty, an Insurance policy

was produced of a car bearing Reg.No.MH-12/FA-5086 to

contend that the vehicle was insured. Since the

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705

AND 1 OTHER

fundamental question as to which vehicle was involved in

the accident and whether it was insured or not has not

been considered in the proper perspective, in my view, it

would be appropriate to set aside the award passed by the

Tribunal and remand the matter to the Tribunal with a

direction to the Tribunal to first record a clear finding as to

which was the vehicle, which was involved in the accident

and whether the claimants were travelling in the said

vehicle and whether the said vehicle was insured.

7. The parties, since being represented before this

Court, are directed to appear before the Tribunal on

14.10.2024 and to take further instructions in the matter.

8. The amount in deposit shall be transferred and

shall be disbursed in terms of the award that is likely to be

passed.

9. The appeals filed by the Insurer e allowed and

matter is remitted back to the Tribunal with the aforesaid

directions.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:6705

AND 1 OTHER

10. Since, the appeals filed by the Insurer are being

allowed, the appeals fled by the claimants would not

survive for consideration and they are reserved the right

to make all their claims before the Tribunal afresh.

Sd/-

(N.S.SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

SN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter