Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22152 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:35552-DB
RFA No.1858/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1858/2023 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
M/S MAHENDRA DEVELOPERS
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
SRI P B MAHENDRA
DOOR NO.37, MAYURAM ENCLAVE
NAGAVALA VILLAGE, YELAVALA HOBLI
MYSURU TALUK - 571 130 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.P MAHESHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
1. GOVINDEGOWDA
S/O LATE KARIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
R/O YALACHALLI VILLAGE
MAIDABAHALLI POST
Digitally
signed by K S YELAWALA HOBLI
RENUKAMBA MYSURU TLAUK - 571 130
Location:
High Court of 2. SMT ANKAMMA
Karnataka
W/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
3. SRI J S SRINIVAS
S/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
4. SRI J S SATHISHA
S/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE
R/AT SREERAMPURA VILLAGE
CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:35552-DB
RFA No.1858/2023
K.R.NAGARA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 602
5. SMT J S PUSHPANJALI
D/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA
W/O K C KUBERA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT KENCHUGARA KOPPAL VILLAGE
KESTURU POST
CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI
K R NAGARA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 602
6. SMT J S SUKANYA
D/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA
W/O G R PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT NO.5, 4TH CROSS
5TH MAIN, MATHRU LAYOUT
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN
G K V K POST
BENGALURU - 560 065
7. NAGARATHNAMMA
W/O LATE GOWDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
R/O YALACHALLI VILLAGE
MAIDANAHALLI POST
YELWALA HOBLI
MYSURU TALUK - 571 130 ... RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96
OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET AIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.06.2023
PASSED IN FDP NO.34/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU, PARTLY DECREEING
THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:35552-DB
RFA No.1858/2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)
No representation for the appellant.
Despite granting sufficient opportunity, needful is not
done. There are no grounds to grant further adjournment.
Therefore, appeal is dismissed for non compliance.
Sd/-
(K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE
Sd/-
(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!