Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25913 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42590
RFA No. 985 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 985 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
KRISHNA
S/O K.VISHWANATHA NAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/O NO.23,7TH MAIN ,
KARAGAPPA GARDEN,
S.R.NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560027
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.VINAY S.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SRI. K. VISHWANATHA NAYAK
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA NAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/O NO.36
Digitally PAPAMMA NILAYA,
signed by CHOULE GALLI
BHARATHI S
Location:
RAMANNAPET, CUBBONPET,
HIGH BANGALORE-560002
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
2. SRI.HEMANTH KUMAR NAIK
S/O M.VISHWANATH NAIK
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
2(A) SMT. NIRMALA
W/O HEMANTH KUMAR NAIK
AGED MAJOR,
OCC:HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O NO.36, CHOULAGALLI,
RAMANNAPET
BANGALORE-560002
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42590
RFA No. 985 of 2014
2(B) SRI.DHANUSH
S/O LATE HEMANTH NAIK
SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY MINOR
GUARDIAN MOTHER
SMT.NIRMALA
W/O LATE HEMANTH NAIK,
AGED MAJOR,
OCC:HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O NO.36, CHOULAGALLI,
RAMANNAPET,
BANGALORE-560002
3. SMT. PREMALATHA V
D/O M.VISHWANATH NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/O NO.36, CHOULAGALLI,
RAMANNA PET,
BANGALORE-560002
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GANGADHAR AITHAL.,ADVOCATE FOR R1
NOTICE TO R2(A) IS HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DTD 15.12.2017
R2(B) IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R2(A)
NOTICE TO R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DTD 24.6.2016)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.3.2014 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.1470/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo in the
registry for withdrawing the appeal as the said appeal has
become infructuous on the death of the respondent No.1 who is
NC: 2024:KHC:42590
the father of appellant and seeks liberty to file the fresh suit on
new cause of action for partition and separate possession.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed for.
Sd/-
(K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE
BS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!