Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25626 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43462
RSA No. 1548 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1548 OF 2021 (SP)
BETWEEN:
SMT. NANJAMMA
W/O LATE VENKATAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/O JANNAGHATTA VILLAGE AND POST
SUGATUR HOBLI,
KOLAR TALUK 563101
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI K N NARAYANASWAMY
Digitally S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA
signed by R AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
DEEPA
R A/T JANNAGHATTA VILLAGE AND POST
Location: SUGATUR HOBLI,
HIGH
KOLAR TALUK 563101
COURT OF
KARNATAKA ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VARADAREDDY G K., ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.12.2020
PASSED IN RA.No.92/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR,
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 25.04.2019 PASSED IN OS.No.190/2010
ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
KOLAR.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43462
RSA No. 1548 of 2021
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This regular second appeal was filed on 15.02.2021.
Office has raised objections and time was granted to
comply with the office objections. Inspite of granting
sufficient time, the appellant did not comply with the office
objections. The matter was listed before the Court on
18.01.2024, two weeks time was granted to comply with
the office objections. Again the matter was listed on
25.06.2024. None appeared for the appellant. Another
two weeks time was granted to comply with the office
objections on payment of cost of Rs.500/-, payable at the
registry, and it was made clear that if office objections are
not complied and cost is not paid within the stipulated
time, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to
the Bench.
NC: 2024:KHC:43462
2. Case called. None appears for the appellant. The
appeal was filed in the year 2021. Inspite of granting
sufficient time, the appellant did not comply with the office
objections and not paid the cost as ordered by this Court.
In view of the peremptory order, the appeal is dismissed
for non-compliance of the office objections.
Sd/-
(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!