Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25536 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43168
CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1084 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1. JAGANNATH SHETTY BALA,
S/O VITTALA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT AKSHARA NEAR BANTARA SANGHA,
SURATHKAL, MANGALURU, D.K - 575 011.
(EX PRINTER/PUBLISHER OF JAYAKIRANA,
KANNADA NEW PAPER)
2. MANOJ HALEYANGADY,
S/O SRI. RAMA SUVARNA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
EDITOR, "JAYAKIRANA",
KANNADA NEWS PAPER,
BEJAI MANGALURU, D.K - 575 004.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by AND:
MALATESH
KC SRI. K.P. JOHN,
Location: S/O K.T. POTHAN,
HIGH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
COURT OF R/AT MARIYA BHAWAN,
KARNATAKA
NELLYADI VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK,
D.K. DISTRICT - 574 229.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. GIREESHA G.T, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S
438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND CONVICTION ORDER DATED 30.10.2018 MADE IN
CC.NO.1008/2007 BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43168
CRL.RP No. 1084 of 2024
AT PUTTUR D.K AND JUDGMENT DATED 30.07.2024 PASSED IN
CRL.A.NO.5050/2018 BY THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE D.K MANGALURU SITTING AT
PUTTUR D.K.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
I.A.No.2/2024 is filed under Section 482 read with
Section 320(1) of Cr.P.C. to compound the offence. Application
is signed by learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent.
Same is supported by affidavits of the revision petitioners and
the complainant.
Perused the application and the affidavits.
Upon the private complaint lodged by the respondent,
learned Trial magistrate took cognizance of the offence
punishable under Section 500 read with Section 34 of IPC
against the revision petitioners and after due trial, revision
petitioners were convicted and conviction order was upheld by
the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court.
NC: 2024:KHC:43168
Revision petitioners have now retraced their mistake and
tendered apology to the respondent which has been
acknowledged by the petitioners by filing the affidavits.
Since, the complainant is agreeable to compound the
offence alleged against the revision petitioners, even though,
the matter is at the revisional stage, by exercising the power
vested in this Court under Section 320(1) of Cr.P.C.,
I.A.No.2/2024 is allowed and revision petitioners are
permitted to compound the offence alleged against the revision
petitioners.
Consequently, the conviction order passed by the learned
Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court is hereby
set aside.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!