Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25500 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43192
MFA No. 2436 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2436 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI NAGESH B.N.
S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT NO.34,
BHEEMANAKUPPE VILLAGE
KENGERI HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NAGARAJA REDDY D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. NARASAMMA
W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH 2. SRILAKSHMAIAH B.N0
COURT OF S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
3. SRI NAGARAJ
S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
4. SMT. RATHNA
D/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
NO.1 TO 4 ARE
R/AT BHEEMANAKUPPE VILLAGE
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43192
MFA No. 2436 of 2022
KENGERI HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.
5. SRI JAVARAYA GOWDA
S/O LATE MAYAGE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/AT NO.41, 3RD MAIN
G.H.B. SOCIETY
SAHKARA NAGAR
BANGALORE - 560096.
6. SRI ASHWATH
W/O VENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
7. VENKATAPPA
S/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
NO.6 AND 7 ARE R/AT NO.26,
MATHRU SHREE NILAYA
MUDDANAPALYA VILLAGE
YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE - 560091.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR &
SRI K.LOKESH, ADVOCATES FOR C/R6)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) R/W SECTION 104
OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19.01.2022 PASSED ON
IA NO.3 AND 4 IN O.S.NO.69/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE 4TH
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE , BENGALURU RURAL
DISTRICT, BENGALURU, REJECTING IA NO.3 AND 4 FILED
U/O.39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC WITH COSTS OF RS.50,000/-.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:43192
MFA No. 2436 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
This Court vide order dated 14.06.2024, when this Court
noticed that matter is listed fifth time for non-compliance of
office objections, considered the request of the learned counsel
for the appellant and granted a week's time to comply with the
office objections on cost of Rs.1,000/- and also made it clear
that, if cost is not paid and office objections are not complied
with, list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of the said order, the
office objections are not complied with and cost is also not
paid.
Hence, the miscellaneous first appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!