Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25497 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43146
RSA No. 139 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2015 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
G.H.GOVINDAPPA,
S/O HANUMANNA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/O GALIHALLI VILLAGE,
BIRUR POST, KADUR TALUK-577 101.
...APPELLANT
[BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAJU H., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
1. HANUMANNA,
S/O KENCHANNA,
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
R/O KARAHALLI VILLAGE,
BIRUR POST, KADUR TALUK-577 101.
2. THIMMANNA,
S/O LATE KENCHANNA,
Digitally signed by AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS,
ANUSHA V R/O KAREHALLI VILLAGE,
Location: High BIRUR POST, KADUR TALUK-577 101.
Court Of Karnataka
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC R/W ORDER
XLII RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
15.09.2014 PASSED IN RA NO. 46/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, KADUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.06.2009
PASSED IN OS NO. 229/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE
(JR.DN.) AT KADUR.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43146
RSA No. 139 of 2015
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Appeal was dismissed by order dated 25.01.2021 for
non-compliance of office objections. Thereafter, appeal was
restored on application for recalling said order. Even thereafter,
office objections have not been complied despite grant
of sufficient opportunity. None appears for appellant.
This would indicate appellant is not diligent in prosecuting
appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution on
cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) payable to
Chief Minister's Relief Fund.
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!