Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kumari Anusha vs Sri Venkatesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 24898 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 24898 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Kumari Anusha vs Sri Venkatesh on 16 October, 2024

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                               -1-
                                                            NC: 2024:KHC:41921
                                                        MFA No. 4368 of 2016




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                          DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
                                            BEFORE
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4368 OF 2016 (MV-I)


                   BETWEEN:

                   KUMARI. ANUSHA
                   D/O. GIRISH
                   AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS
                   BEING MINOR REPT BY YOUR
                   NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER
                   SMT. DIVYA
                   R/AT CHELLANAHALLI VILLAGE,
                   HUNASUR TALUK,
                   MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 015.
                                                                  ...APPELLANT

                   (BY SRI. DIVAKARA P.S., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    SRI VENKATESH
Digitally signed         S/O VALLI KANNAGOUNDAR
by RAMYA D
Location: HIGH
                         MAJOR,
COURT OF                 R/AT PADUVAKOTE VILLAGE,
KARNATAKA
                         S.D.KOTE TALUK,
                         MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 017.

                   2.    THE MANAGER
                         UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                         3RD FLOOR, SUNDAR ARCADE,
                         BEFORE KSRTC BUS STAND,
                         MYSORE - 570 016.
                                                          ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI. GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
                       NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:41921
                                     MFA No. 4368 of 2016




     THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.11.2014 PASSED IN MVC
NO. 1166/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER,
FAST TRACK COURT, HUNSUR, MYSORE DISTRICT, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

                       ORAL JUDGMENT

The present appeal is filed by the

appellant/claimant challenging the judgment and award

dated 20.11.2014 passed in MVC.No.1166/2013 by the

Fast Track court & Addl. MACT at Hunsur, Mysore District,

for enhancement of compensation.

2. The factum of accident, injuries sustained by

the claimant and coverage of insurance are not disputed.

3. Heard the arguments from both sides and

perused the records.

NC: 2024:KHC:41921

4. In the present case, the claimant who is five

years old girl has sustained the following injuries:

i. Defused swelling at lower 1/3rd of right leg ii. Abrasion over middle 1/3rd of the leg iii. Movement of that region is painful and restricted

5. The Tribunal has awarded compensation under

various heads as follows:

1 Pain and suffering Rs. 30,000/-

2 Medical expenses Rs. 60,000/-

3 Loss of amenities Rs. 20,000/-

                      TOTAL               Rs.       1,10,000/-




     6.     Ex.P.6   is the   wound    certificate,    Ex.P.8    to

Ex.P.33 are the medical bills. Ex.P.34 to Ex.P.40 are the

prescriptions. Ex.P.41 is the discharge summary. Ex.P.42

to Ex.P.44 are three X-ray photos. The doctor is examined

as P.W.2 and has deposed that he has given treatment to

the claimant and has operated her fractured bone and

inserted implants. It is the evidence of the doctor that the

claimant has suffered shortening of right leg by half an

NC: 2024:KHC:41921

inch compared to the left leg. The claimant is finding

difficulty in moving the affected limb and other

deficiencies. It is the opinion of the doctor that the

claimant has suffered 18% of disability to the affected

limb.

7. Considering that the claimant is a minor girl of

five years old and suffered shortening of right leg by half

an inch, therefore, the claimant is constrained to suffer her

whole life by such shortening of leg. Therefore, the

claimant has suffered 10% of permanent physical disability

towards whole body. Therefore, in case of injuries

sustained by minor children, what would be compensation

awarded is guided by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Master Mallikarjun vs. Divisional

Manager, The National Insurance Co. Ltd.,1

8. Therefore, in the present case, the claimant had

sustained physical disability at 10%. Hence, compensation

AIR 2014 SC 736

NC: 2024:KHC:41921

awarded to the claimant under the various heads as

following:

               Head                    Compensation amount

Pain    and    suffering   already          Rs.3,00,000
undergone and to be suffered in

future, mental and physical shock hardship, inconvenience, and discomforts, etc. and loss of amenities in life on account of permanent disability.

Discomfort, inconvenience and loss Rs.25,000/- of earnings to the parents during the period of hospitalization.

Medical and incidental expenses Rs.60,000/- during the period of hospitalization for 58 days.

Future medical expenses for Rs. 25,000 correction of the mal union of fracture and incidental expenses for such treatment.

Total Rs.4,10,000/-

9. Therefore, the claimant is awarded a total

compensation of Rs.4,10,000/- as against the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.1,10,000/-.

Hence, the claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation

of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rs.4,10,000/- - Rs.1,10,000/-) along

NC: 2024:KHC:41921

with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of

the petition till realization.

10. In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i. Appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii. The impugned judgment and award dated

20.11.2014 passed in MVC.No.1166/2013 by

the Fast Track court & Addl. MACT at Hunsur,

Mysore District, is modified to the extent that

the appellant/claimant is entitled to enhanced

compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- along with

interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the

date of petition till the date of realization.

iii. No order as to costs.

iv. Registry is directed to transmit the TCR along

with copy of this order to the Tribunal

forthwith.

NC: 2024:KHC:41921

v. The appellant/claimant is not entitled for

interest for the delay period of 491 days in

filing the appeal.

vi. Draw award accordingly.

SD/-

(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE

PB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter