Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rakesh S @ Rakesha vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 28077 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28077 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Rakesh S @ Rakesha vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 November, 2024

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar

                                                  -1-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:47948
                                                          CRL.A No. 2081 of 2024




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                                BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2081 OF 2024


                      BETWEEN:

                            RAKESH S @ RAKESHA
                            S/O SRINIVASA V
                            AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
                            AGRICULTURIST
                            VTC KUNCHIGANAL VILLAGE
                            INGALADALU POST
                            CHITRADURGA TALUK
                            AND DISTRICT PIN - 577 524.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT

                      (BY SRI E SUYOG HERELE, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA             THROUGH CHITRADURGA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                            RURAL POLICE STATION
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                            CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
                            REPRESENTED BY THE
                            STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                            HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
                            HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                            BANGALORE - 560 001.

                      2.    SRI CHANDRAPPA
                            S/O JAWAN DYAMAJJA
                            AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
                            COOLIE WORK
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:47948
                                    CRL.A No. 2081 of 2024




    R/O REDDIHALLI VILLAGE
    CHALLAKERE TALUK
    CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
     PIN: 577 502.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI B LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1
    R2 SERVED. UNREPRESENTED)

      THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF
SC/ST (POA) ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
10.10.2024 IN CRL.MISC.No.1156/2024 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SPECIAL 2ND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AT CHITRADURGA, THEREBY DISMISSING THE BAIL
APPLICATION OF THE APPELLANT UNDER SECTION 439 OF
Cr.P.C., FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
506, 504, 202, 201, 304 R/W 34 OF IPC, SECTION 3(2)(V),
3(2)(r)(s) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989, BY ALLOWING THIS
CRL.A. AND ETC.,

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                   ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellant -accused No.1

praying to set aside the order dated 10.10.2024 passed in

Crl.Misc.No.1156/2024 by the Special II Additional Distirct

and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, whereunder the bail

petition of this appellant -accused No.1 sought in respect

of crime No.129/2024 of Chitradurga Rural Police Station

NC: 2024:KHC:47948

for offences punishable under Sections 506, 504, 202,

201, 304 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code

(Hereinafter referred to as "IPC" for brevity) and Sections

3(2)(V) and 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989 (Hereinafter referred to as "SC

and ST Act" for brevity) came to be rejected.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-

accused No.1 and learned High Court Government Pleader

for respondent No.1-State. Inspite of service of notice

respondent No.2 remained absent and unrepresented.

3. The case of the prosecution is that, on

30.03.2024 in Kunchiganalu village, there was a festival of

Sri. Kanive Maramma in their village and CW.16 to 19 and

accused no.1 had gone near Ingaladal Gate, Bharath

Bench Show Room in front of the Anjaneyaswamy Temple

for doing liquor party and at that time accused no.2 came

there along with deceased -Devaraj and thereafter all went

to the MSIL Bar near Doddasiddavvanahally and purchased

the liquor bottles and at about 12.30 a.m they came near

NC: 2024:KHC:47948

NH-48 road, under the bridge and they were doing the

liquor party. At that time the accused no.1 asked to

accused No.2 why he is not coming with him and why he is

not talking properly with him and told him that he has to

hear him. Then accused no.1 assaulted on the left hand

shoulder of accused no.2 by broken bear bottle and

thereby caused blood injuries. Then CW.19 came there

and pacified the quarrel. At that time the broken bear

bottle touched the right hand finger of CW.19 and thereby

he sustained injuries. Then deceased -Devaraj took

accused no.2 at some distance in order to console him, at

that time accused no.1 threw bear bottle towards the

accused no.2 but hit on the back side head of deceased -

Devaraja and thereby he sustained injuries. Accused no.1

also abused him by taking his caste and also gave life

threat that if anybody inform the said fact he will kill them.

Then CW.17 brought the CW.19 to the District Hospital,

Chitradurga. Then accused no.1 and 2 brought deceased -

Devaraja on motorcycle to Chitradurga Government

NC: 2024:KHC:47948

Hospital and they hide the said fact and informed that they

were coming in motorcycle and they fell down and thereby

sustained injuries. Accused no.2 by hiding the said fact

filed complaint stating that they sustained injuries in the

road traffic accident. The police have filed charge sheet

against the accused for the offences punishable under

Sections 3(2)(V), 3(1)(r)(s) of SC and ST Act and Sections

506, 504, 202, 201, 304 R/w 34 of IPC. The appellant -

accused No.1 came to be arrested on 20.05.2024 and he

is in judicial custody. The appellant -accused No.1 has

filed bail petition and same came to be rejected by

impugned order which is challenged in this appeal.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant -accused

No.1 would contend that there was no intention on the

part of the appellant -accused No.1 to kill the deceased -

Devaraju as bottle thrown by the appellant -accused No.1

was towards accused No.2 and accidentally hit on the head

of the deceased. The doctor who conducted the post

mortem examination of the dead body of the deceased has

NC: 2024:KHC:47948

opined that death is due to the head injury. He further

submits that as charge sheet is filed, this appellant -

accused No.1 is not required for custodial interrogation.

On these grounds he prays to allow the appeal and grant

bail to the appellant -accused No.1.

5. Learned High Court Government Pleader for

respondent No.1-State would contend that due to act of

this appellant -accused No.1 throwing bottle towards

accused No.2 and it is hit accidentally to the deceased -

Devaraju, he sustained head injury and died in the

hospital after 04 days. The offence alleged against the

appellant -accused No.1 is punishable with imprisonment

for life or imprisonment of either description for a term

which may extend to 10 years. Charge sheet materials

shows prima facie case against this appellant -accused

No.1. On these grounds, he prays for dismissal of the

appeal.

6. Having heard learned counsel, this Court has

perused the impugned order and charge sheet materials.

NC: 2024:KHC:47948

7. In the quarrel, the appellant -accused No.1

threw the bottle towards accused No.2 and accidentally hit

the back side of the head of the deceased -Devaraja and

after 04 days he died in the hospital. Considering the said

aspect, there is no intention on the part of the appellant -

accused No.1 to kill the deceased. As charge sheet is

filed, this appellant -accused No.1 is not required for

custodial interrogation. The appellant -accused No.1 has

made out grounds for setting aside impugned order and

grant of bail.

8. In the result, the following

ORDER

The appeal is allowed.

The impugned order dated 10.10.2024 passed in

Crl.Misc.No.1156/2024 by the Special II Additional Distirct

and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga is set aside. The bail

petition of this appellant -accused No. 2 is allowed and he

is ordered to be released on bail in Crime No.129/2024 of

NC: 2024:KHC:47948

Chitradurga Rural Police Station subject to the following

conditions:

i. The appellant -accused No.1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one Lakh only) with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.


         ii.    The appellant -accused No.1 shall not
                threaten    complainant      and      other
                prosecution witness.

         iii.   The   appellant   -accused     No.1   shall

attend the Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and cooperate in speedy disposal of the case.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

DSP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter