Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28010 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:17043
RSA No. 100168 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
RSA NO. 100168 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
GIRIYAPPA
S/O. BASANAGOUDA GIRADDI,
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,
1. SUREKHA
W/O. GIRIYAPPA GIRADDI,
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. SHIVANAND NAGAR,
DHARWAD-580001.
2. SHARAN
S/O. GIRIYAPPA GIRADDI,
Digitally
VISHAL
signed by
VISHAL
NINGAPPA
AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
NINGAPPA PATTIHAL
PATTIHAL Date:
2024.11.23
R/O. SHIVANAND NAGAR,
10:27:57
+0530 DHARWAD-580001.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BASAVARAJ
S/O. MALLAPPA BHOOPALAPUR,
AGE: 84 YEARS, OCC. RETD. SERVANT,
R/O. PURNIMA BUILDING,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:17043
RSA No. 100168 of 2018
NO.12 SHIVANAND NAGAR,
DHARWAD-580001.
2. PRABHURAJ
S/O. BASAVARAJ BHOOPALAPUR,
AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE,
R/O. PURNIMA BUILDING,
NO.12 SHIVANAND NAGAR,
DHARWAD-580001.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHETAN T. LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. PRAKASH S. UDIKERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, 1908,
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:24.10.2017
PASSED IN R.A.NO.180/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD,
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD:08.04.2014, PASSED IN
O.S. NO.317/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL
CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, DHARWAD, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:17043
RSA No. 100168 of 2018
ORAL JUDGMENT
Both the learned counsels submit that the parties
have amicably settled the dispute before the Lok-Adalat
which was scheduled on 13.07.2019 in EP No.36/2018
dated 13.07.2019 pending on the file of III Additional Civil
Judge and JMFC, Dharwad. The operative portion of the
order in EP No.36/2018 is furnished by the respondents
counsel which reads as under;
"Counsel for D.Hr. filed a memo stating that, petition is satisfied in full and the same may be closed.
In view of the memo filed by the D.Hr. the petition is closed before Lok Adalath as entered into full satisfaction."
Recording the submission of both the learned
counsels that Execution Petition is closed as fully satisfied,
the present appeal stands disposed of as does not
survive for consideration.
Pending IAs, if any, do not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
(JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)
PJ / CT:PA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!