Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S L And T Finance Limited vs M/S Buoyant Technology Constellations ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 27982 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27982 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S L And T Finance Limited vs M/S Buoyant Technology Constellations ... on 22 November, 2024

                                              -1-
                                                       NC: 2024:KHC:47568-DB
                                                     COMAP No. 206 of 2021




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                           PRESENT
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
                                              AND
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
                             COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 206 OF 2021
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    M/S L AND T FINANCE LIMITED
                         HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                         4TH FLOOR, BRINDAVAN #177
                         CST ROAD, KALINA SANTACRUZ (E)
                         MUMBAI - 400098.
                         HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT
                         UNIT NO.1, 3RD FLOOR NO.301
                         PRIDE HULKUL, NO.16 LALBAGH ROAD,
                         OPP PASSPORT OFFICE
                         BENGALURU - 560027.
                         REPRESENTED BY ITS
                         AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
                         SRI SRUNGAVARAPU VENKATA
Digitally signed
by                       SATYA SAI KRISHNA
SREEDHARAN
BANGALORE                S/O VENKATA RAO
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI                  AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
                                                                ...APPELLANT
KARNATAKA          (BY SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    M/S. BUOYANT TECHNOLOGY
                         CONSTELLATIONS PVT LIMITED
                         EARLIER KNOWN AS MANTRI TECHNOLOGY
                         CONSTELLATIONS (P) LIMITED
                         HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                         MANTRI HOUSE
                         41, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD
                           -2-
                                  NC: 2024:KHC:47568-DB
                                 COMAP No. 206 of 2021




     BANGALORE - 560001.
     REPRESENTED BY ITS
     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     ANIL KUMAR A

2.   MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
     MANTRI HOUSE
     41, VITTALMALLYA ROAD
     BANGALORE - 560001.
     REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
     MR SUSHIL MANTRI.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH S., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
    SRI. ANISH ACHARYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)


      THIS COMAP / COMMERCIAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION
37(1)(B) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT R/W
RULE 4 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ARBITRATION
(PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURTS) RULES 2001, R/W
SECTION 13(1) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL
DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH
COURTS ACT, 2015, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY
BE PLEASED TO I. CALL FOR RECORDS IN COM.A.Α.ΝΟ.
192/2021 BY THE LEARNED LXXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS     JUDGE     AT    BENGALURU    (CCH     88).
II. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 02/11/2021
PASSED ON I.A.NOS. 1/2021 FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE
1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC AND SECTION 9 OF THE
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 IN COM.A.A.NO.
192/2021 BY THE LEARNED LXXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH 88) (ANNEXURE- A)
AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE ORDERS
AS SOUGHT FOR IN I.A.NOS. 1/2021 FILED UNDER ORDER
XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC AND SECTION
9 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 IN
COM.A.A.NO. 192/2021 BEFORE THE LEARNED LXXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH 88)
(ANNEXURE-B). III. GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF THAT THIS
HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE MATTER.
                                  -3-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:47568-DB
                                           COMAP No. 206 of 2021




    THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
            and
            HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for

withdrawal. The same is taken on record.

2. The memo for withdrawal reads as under:

"The Petitioner has filed the present appeal challenging the Impugned Order dated 02.11.2021 passed in I.A. No.1/2021 filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Com.A.A No. 192/2021 by the Learned LXXXVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, at Bengaluru (CCH-88), grant ad-interim ex-parte orders as sought for in I.A. Nos.1/2021 filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Com.A.A No.192/2021 by the Learned LXXXVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, at Bengaluru, allow Com.A.A No. 192/2021 filed by the Appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and other consequential reliefs.

It is submitted that the Appellant herein has assigned the loan to Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (ARCIL) vide an Assignment agreement dated 29.12.2022 and the Arbitration proceedings initiated against the Respondents herein has concluded and an Arbitral

NC: 2024:KHC:47568-DB

Award dated 18.06.2024 has been passed by the Hon'ble Arbitral Tribunal. It is further submitted that, the Section 9 Application bearing No. Com.A.A No. 192/2021 filed by the Appellant is also disposed of.

In light of the same, it is most humbly prayed before this Hon'ble Court that the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal in the interest of justice and equity."

3. Learned counsel for the appellants reiterates the

prayer as made in the memo for withdrawal of the appeal. The

appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal,

I.A.No.1/2022 does not survive for consideration, Accordingly,

the same is disposed of.

Sd/-

(V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE

Sd/-

(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE TL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter