Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Alekhya Property Develoments ... vs The Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 26953 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26953 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S Alekhya Property Develoments ... vs The Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory ... on 11 November, 2024

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                     -1-
                                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:45614
                                                                 WP No. 3938 of 2024




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                                  BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3938 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
                        BETWEEN:

                        M/S ALEKHYA PROPERTY DEVELOMENTS
                        PRIVATE LIMITED
                        A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
                        THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT,1956
                        HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                        NO. 2/4, LANGFORD GARDEN
                        RICHMOND TOWN, BENGALURU KARNATAKA 560025
                        REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. B M KARUNESH
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                        (BY SMT. SHIVANI P MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR
                            SRI. AISHWARYA PRASAD.,ADVOCATE)

                        AND:

                        1.    THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE
                              REGULATORY AUTHORITY
                              2nd FLOOR , SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK
Digitally signed by B
K
                              UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND
MAHENDRAKUMAR                 BENGALURU 560 027
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                      REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
KARNATAKA

                        2.    MS. POOJA PRIYADARSHINI
                              AGED MAJOR,
                              FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
                              AT F-08A, SAIL CITY, NEW PUNDANG
                              RANCHI, JHARKHAND 843 004.
                                                             ...RESPONDENTS
                        (BY SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                            SRI. M D RAJAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

                            THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
                        AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2024:KHC:45614
                                              WP No. 3938 of 2024




ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 06/12/2023 PASSED BY THE R1
AUTHORITY IN COMPLAINT NO. CMP/00573/2023 (ANNEXURE-
A).
     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE
THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                           ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has challenged the order passed by Respondent No.1 - Bank, wherein the petitioner was directed to pay interest on the delayed period at the rate of SBI MCLR + 2% from 31.12.2019 until the date of handing over possession along with the occupancy certificate. Additionally, the promoter was required to pay interest for the delay period as calculated by the complainant, amounting to Rs.24,14,191/-.

2. By an order dated 18.07.2024, this Court referred the matter to the Bengaluru Mediation Centre, Bengaluru, to explore the possibility of a settlement between the parties.

3. The parties appeared before the Mediation Centre and entered into a memorandum of settlement under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Rules 24 and 25 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005.

4. As per the terms of the settlement, Respondent No.2 agreed to pay a sum of Rs.1,26,51,146/- towards the sale consideration for the purchase of the apartment unit.

NC: 2024:KHC:45614

5. Respondent No.2 has already paid a partial amount of Rs.63,84,131/- to the petitioner and is due to pay Rs.72,00,350/- as the remaining balance towards the sale consideration.

6. Under the terms of the settlement, it was agreed between the petitioner and Respondent No.2 that a total compensation of Rs.6,27,008/- would be payable by the petitioner to Respondent No.2 for the delay in handing over the apartment unit. This compensation amount would be adjusted against the outstanding balance payable by Respondent No.2 to the petitioner.

7. The petitioner and Respondent No.2 further agreed that the petitioner shall complete all agreed-upon fittings for the apartment unit on or before 24.12.2024.

8. Additionally, Respondent No.2 agreed to pay the remaining balance of Rs.65,73,342/- after deducting the compensation amount of Rs.6,27,008/- from the actual outstanding balance of Rs.72,00,350/- on or before 24.12.2024.

9. In light of the settlement reached between the parties, the petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE

BKM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter