Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11745 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 May, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:3342-DB
MFA No.200484 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200484 OF 2018 (MC-DIV)
BETWEEN:
MR. K.SRINIVAS RAJU
S/O SAYANNA,
AGE: 40 YEARS,
OCC: SERVICE IN HEALTH DEPARTMENT,
R/O H.NO.2-1-161,
N.G.O'S COLONY,
ZAHIRABAD - 502 220.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI MARTHANDAPPA MALLESHAPPA ALLUR, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by AND:
BASALINGAPPA
SHIVARAJ
DHUTTARGAON
Location: High
SMT. K.SUMAN DHULE
Court Of Karnataka W/O K.SRINIVAS RAJU
(D/O TUKARAM),
AGE: 37 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND ASSISTANT
TEACHER WORKING IN Z.P. HR.P.S.RAIKOD,
R/O NOW AT PROPER BIDAR,
C/O LAXUMAN KESARI,
ALLAMPRABHU NAGAR
NEAR GUMPA, BIDAR - 585 401.
...RESPONDENT
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:3342-DB
MFA No.200484 of 2018
(BY SRI LIYAQAT FAREED USTAD, ADVOCATE FOR
C/RESPONDENT)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28 OF THE HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 PRAYING TO:
a) CALL FOR RECORDS IN M.C.NO.14/2015 ON THE FILE
OF 2ND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
J.M.F.C., AT BIDAR,
b) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED :
17.01.208 AND DECREE DATED 06.02.2018 PASSED
BY THE 2ND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
J.M.F.C., AT BIDAR IN M.C.NO.14/2015 BY ALLOWING
THIS APPEAL.
c) CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE DIVORCE PETITION
FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN M.C.NO.14/2015 ON
THE FILE OF 2ND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND J.M.F.C., AT BIDAR.
d) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF OR RELIEFS WHICH THIS
HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ASHOK
S. KINAGI J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:3342-DB
MFA No.200484 of 2018
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo for
withdrawal. It is stated that the appellant has made efforts
to convince the respondent to come back to matrimonial
house to lead happy married life in the interest of future of
two children, but his efforts failed as the respondent
refused for the same. Hence, the appellant may be
permitted to withdraw the appeal as not pressed.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as
not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!