Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6277 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1885-DB
WA No.200121 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
WRIT APPEAL NO.200121 OF 2015 (S-DIS)
BETWEEN:
SRI KRISHNAPPA JAMADER
S/O PANDURANGA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/A MIRZAPUR AT SASTHAPUR
POST BASAVANAKALYANA, BIDAR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI V.K. NAYAK, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by
VARSHA N
RASALKAR 1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
Location: HIGH CENTRAL SECTOR
COURT OF
KARNATAKA CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
VIBHOOTHI DIVISION
GOMTINAGAR, LUCKNOW
UTTARPRADESH.
2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR
GENERAL OF POLICE
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
BIJANUR, LUCKNOW
UTTAR PRADESH
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1885-DB
WA No.200121 of 2015
3. COMMANDANT 162 BATTALION
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
ANANTHANG, JAMMU & KASHMIR.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SUDHIR SINGH VIJAPUR, D.S.G.I., FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED
23.03.2015 PASSED IN W.P.NO.81125/2009, CONSEQUENTLY
ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION UPON EXTENDED THE RELIEF
SOUGHT FOR IN THE WRIT PETITION, PASS SUCH OTHER
ORDER, DECREE OR JUDGMENT WHICH DEEMS IT FIT AND
PROPER IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE
AND ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL WITH COSTS, IN THE ENDS OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,
THIS DAY H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. None appears for the appellant.
2. This Court by order dated 05.01.2016 dismissed the
appeal for non-prosecution. The same has been recalled
by order dated 24.11.2016.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1885-DB
3. When the matter was posted on 26.05.2021, none
appeared for the appellant. Hence, the matter was
adjourned by three weeks. Again the matter was posted
on 09.07.2021, none appeared for the appellant. Even
when the matter was posted on 03.08.2021, 17.11.2021,
28.02.2022, 21.10.2022 and 13.02.2023, none appeared
for the appellant.
4. Even today also there is no representation on behalf
of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not
interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
HA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!