Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6271 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:8708
RFA No. 220 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT SHANTHAMMA,
D/O LATE SRI NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
2. SMT SULOCHANA,
D/O LATE SRI NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
3. SRI SHEKAR,
S/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
4. SRI SAMPATH,
S/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
5. SRI TIRUPATHI,
S/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
Digitally AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
signed by
PRAMILA G V 6. SRI SATHYANARAYANA
Location: S/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
HIGH COURT AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
OF
KARNATAKA 7. SRI KRISHNA
S/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
8. SRI MANJUNATH
S/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
9. SMT SAROJA,
D/O LATE SMT GUNDAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
ALL R/AT NO.35, PALANI MUDALIAR STREET
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:8708
RFA No. 220 of 2011
ULSOOR, BANGALORE 560 008,
ALL REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY
HOLDERSRI S.M.SUBBANNA,
GRAND SON OF LATE SRI C NANJAPPA
R/AT NO.5,MAYANNA COMPOUND,
MALATHAHALLI BANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI V SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SRI N RAMACHANDRA,
S/O LATE SRI NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT NO.17/E, OLD NO.10/1,
PALANI MUDALIAR STREET,
ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560 008.
2. SMT SUSHEELAMMA,
W/O LATE SRI SATHYANARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT NO.23/14, CANARA BANK COLONY,
GOWDANAPALYA, BANGALORE - 560 061.
3. SMT H S MANJULA,
D/O SRI H M SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/AT NO.556, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS,
5TH MAIN, HANUMANTHANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 019.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S GANGADHARA AITHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3,
V/O/DT: 28.06.2016, APPEAL AGAINST R1 IS DISMISSED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96, O-XLI, RULE-1 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.09.2010
PASSED IN O.S.2520/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVIII-
ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT
FOR THE PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:8708
RFA No. 220 of 2011
ORDER
1. None appeared for the appellants in the morning
session as well as in the afternoon session when the matter
was called. Appeal is of the year 2011. The matter is still
pending for admission. It appears that the appellants are not
interested in prosecuting the appeal.
2. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
BRN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!