Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. M. N. Indira vs M/S. Reliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 14981 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14981 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt. M. N. Indira vs M/S. Reliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd on 28 June, 2024

Author: Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar

                                                      -1-
                                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:24188
                                                                 MFA No. 7143 of 2018




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                                    DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
                                                   BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
                               MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7143 OF 2018 (MV-D)
                        BETWEEN:

                        1.   SMT. M. N. INDIRA,
                             W/O LATE M.S.NATARAJAN,
                             AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
                             R/AT NO.12/4, PADMA KUTEERA APARTMENT,
                             2ND FLOOR, M.R.C.R. EXTENSION,
                             CENTRAL EXCISE LAYOUT,
                             1ST CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR,
                             BENGALURU - 560 040.

                        2.   MR.M.N.VENKATESAN,
                             S/O LATE M.S.NATARAJAN,
                             AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.12/4,
                             PADMA KUTEERA APARTMENT,
                             2ND FLOOR, M.R.C.R. EXTENSION,
                             CENTRAL EXCISE LAYOUT,
                             1ST CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR,
                              BENGALURU - 560 040.
                                                                        ...APPELLANTS
                        (BY SRI. PRAKASH K A.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by B
K
MAHENDRAKUMAR
Location: HIGH
                        AND:
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                        1.   M/S. RELIANCE GEN. INS. CO. LTD.,
                             BRANCH OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR,
                             S.M.TOWERS, 11TH MAIN,
                             3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
                             BENGALURU - 560 011.
                             REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.

                        2.   MR.GIRISH S.T.,
                             S/O MR.THIMMEGOWDA,
                             NO.20, SRINIVASA LAXMAPPA ROAD,
                             BEHIND BALAJI KALYANA MANTAPA,
                             B.S.K. 3RD STAGE,
                             BENGALURU - 560 085.
                                    -2-
                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:24188
                                                MFA No. 7143 of 2018




3.   MR.ASHOK H.C @ MOHAN,
     S/O LATE CHANDRAIAH,
     1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
     KAREEMSAB LAYOUT,
     HEGGANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
     VISHWANEEDAM POST,
     BENGALURU - 560 091.
                                                      ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRADEEP B.,ADVOCATE FOR R1)

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12/02/2018, PASSED IN MVC
NO.7540/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDGE &
MEMBER, MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES (SCCH-18),
BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION      AND    SEEKING     ENHANCEMENT     OF
COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                              JUDGMENT

This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act arises out of the judgment and award dated 12.02.2018, passed by the III Additional Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru (SCCH-18), in MVC No. 7540/2016. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming just and proper compensation on account of the death of Natarajan, who succumbed to injuries sustained in a road traffic accident on 30.08.2016.

2. The tribunal awarded a total compensation amount of Rs.10,12,000/- with interest at 9% per annum. The claimants have appealed, seeking an enhancement of this compensation.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and reviewed the Trial Court Records.

NC: 2024:KHC:24188

4. The death of Natarajan in a road traffic accident on 30.08.2016 is undisputed. At the time of the accident, he was 84 years old and was a pensioner drawing a pension amount of Rs.31,377/-. After deducting 50% towards personal and living expenses, the income of the deceased is assessed at Rs.15,700/-. By adopting a multiplier of '5', the claimants are entitled to a compensation amount of Rs.9,42,000/- towards loss of dependency.

5. The claimants are entitled to a compensation amount of Rs.40,000/- each towards loss of consortium, totaling Rs.80,000/- as against the Rs. 40,000/- awarded by the tribunal.

6. The tribunal awarded Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses, which is considered just and proper.

7. The driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid Driving License on the date of the accident. The Division Bench of this Court, in MFA No. 6154/2019, disposed of on 14.12.2023, relying on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Pappu and others v/s Vinod Kumar Lamba and another (2018) 3 SCC 208, ruled that the Insurance Company is liable to pay the claim amount to the claimant initially, with the liberty to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle in accordance with the law, when the vehicle covered under insurance was driven by a person not holding a valid license. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) The appeal is allowed in part.

NC: 2024:KHC:24188

ii) The claimants are entitled to a total compensation of Rs.10,52,000/- as against the Rs.10,12,000/- awarded by the tribunal.

iii) The enhanced compensation of Rs.40,000/- shall carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

iv) Respondent No. 1 - the Insurance Company, is liable to satisfy the compensation amount awarded to the claimants in the first instance and may recover the same from respondent No. 2 - the owner, in accordance with the law.

To this extent the impugned judgment is modified.

Sd/-

JUDGE

AM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter