Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandapasha vs S A Abdul Rawoof
2024 Latest Caselaw 19034 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19034 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Chandapasha vs S A Abdul Rawoof on 30 July, 2024

Author: V Srishananda

Bench: V Srishananda

                                           -1-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:30136
                                                 MSA No. 33 of 2020




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                     DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                     BEFORE
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
                 MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2020
            BETWEEN:

                  CHANDAPASHA,
                  SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS,

            1.    SHAHANAZ BEGUM,
                  AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
                  W/O. LATE CHANDPASHA,

            2.    SYED SAQUIB PASHA,
                  AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
                  S/O. LATE CHANDPASHA,

            3.    SHABREEN SULTANA,
                  AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
                  D/O. LATE CHANDPASHA,
Digitally
signed by
MALATESH    4.    SYED ABUDL WAHAB
KC                @ SYED RAQHIB PASHA,
Location:
HIGH              AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
COURT OF          S/O. LATE CHANDPASHA,
KARNATAKA
            5.    HARSHADULLA,
                  S/O LATE SYED ABUDL WAHAB
                  @ PYARU SAB,
                  AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

                  APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 5 ARE
                  R/AT MASIDI STREET,
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:30136
                                        MSA No. 33 of 2020




     DEVANAHALLI TOWN,
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
                                             ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. B.S. RADHANANDAN, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   S.A. ABDUL RAWOOF,
     AGDED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
     S/O LATE ABDUL SALAM,
     R/AT KALAMMA GUDI TEMPLE STREET,
     DEVANAHALLI TOWN,
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

2.   SHEIK OBEDULLA SHARIF,
     S/O ABUDL JABBAR,
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
     R/AT KOLAR ROAD,
     VIJAYAPURA TOWN,
     DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

3.   M. RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
     S/O. MUNIYAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
     R/AT THINDLU VILLAGLE,
     SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
     BANGALORE DISTRICT,
     PRESENT R/AT NO. 3,
     2NF FLOOR, 6TH CROSS,
     1ST MAIN ROAD,
     SAMANGIRAM NAGAR,
     BANGALORE - 560 027.

4.   T.M. SRINIVASAIAH,
     S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA,
                              -3-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC:30136
                                      MSA No. 33 of 2020




     AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
     R/AT THINDLU VILLAGE,
     SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
     BANGALORE DISTRICT,

     PRESENT R/AT NO. 68,
     1ST FLOOR, 7TH CROSS,
     SAMPANGIRAM NAGAR,
     BANGALORE - 560 027.

5.   SRI. M.R. PRASANNA,
     S/O. LATE. RANGASWAMY,
     R.AT NO. 604, SATYA GREENS,
     KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD,
     THINDLU, BANGALORE - 560 097.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
    VIDE ORDER DATED 24.07.2020, NOTICE TO R1 TO R4 IS
    DISPENSED WITH)

     THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLII OF THE CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.09.2019
PASSED IN RA.NO.15021/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE V
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND
SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
06.02.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.591/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI,           AND
REMANDING BACK MATTER TO THE TRIAL COURT FOR FRESH
CONSIDERATION AFTER PROVIDING OPPORTUNITY TO THE
APPELLANT.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
                               -4-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC:30136
                                          MSA No. 33 of 2020




                         ORAL JUDGMENT

Sri.B.S.Radhanandan, learned counsel for the

appellants has filed a memo on 30.07.2024. The memo

reads as under:

"The Appellants most respectfully submits as under:

The appellant and the 5th respondent are the contesting parties in the appeal. The 5th respondent is claiming the title through respondent Nos.1 to 4.

The appellants and the respondent No.5 had settled the matter out of Court, and the appellants and 5th respondent had conveyed the subject matter of this appeal to third party jointly as per the sale deed dated 22.09.2023 vide registration No.7707/2023-24. Hence the dispute has been settled between the parties out of Court.

Hence, the same may be taken on record and this matter may be disposed off in accordance with law."

2. Memo is taken on record.

3. In view of the memo, appeal stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

KAV

CT: BHK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter