Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Income Tax Officer vs M/S Panacea Hospital Pvt Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 18763 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18763 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Income Tax Officer vs M/S Panacea Hospital Pvt Ltd on 26 July, 2024

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar

                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2024:KHC:29390
                                                            CRL.A No. 948 of 2021




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 948 OF 2021
                      BETWEEN:

                           THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
                           INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
                           WARD-2(3) H.M.T. BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD,
                           BANGALORE - 560 032.
                                                                      ...APPELLANT

                      (BY SRI E I SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   M/s. PANACEA HOSPITAL PVT. LTD.,
                           No.334, 3RD STAGE, 3RD FLOOR
                           DR SIDDAIAH PURANIK ROAD
                           BASAVESHWARANAGAR
                           BANGALORE.
                           (A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT,
                           REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR-R2)
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYANA       2.   Dr. C JAYANNA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH             MANAGING DIRECTOR
COURT OF                   M/s. PANACEA HOSPITAL PVT. LTD
KARNATAKA
                           No.334, 3RD STAGE, 3RD FLOOR
                           Dr. SIDDAIAH PURANIK ROAD
                           BASAVESHWARANAGAR
                           BANGALORE.
                                                                   ...RESPONDENTS

                           THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 377 OF Cr.P.C
                      PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT RELATING TO SENTENCE
                      DATED 16.11.2019 PASSED BY THE SPECIAL COURT FOR
                      ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BENGLAURU IN C.C.No.102/218 AND
                                    -2-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:29390
                                               CRL.A No. 948 of 2021




ENHANCE THE SENTENCE PASSED AGAINST ACCUSED No.1 -
COMPANY FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION
276B OF INCOME TAX ACT AND ETC.,

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS                              THIS   DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR


                      ORAL JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is filed by the Income Tax

Department against the inadequacy of the sentence dated

16.11.2019 passed in C.C. No. 102/2018 by Special Court

for Economic Offences, Bengaluru.

2. Heard learned counsel for appellant on

maintainability the of appeal.

3. Maintainability of the appeal had come for

consideration before this Court in the case of The Income

Tax Department Vs. M/s. Jenious Clothing Private

Limited and another, Crl.A. No. 2104/2023 and

connected matters decided on 12.07.2024 wherein this

Court considering the relevant details has held that the

appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against the

NC: 2024:KHC:29390

inadequacy of sentence is not maintainable. For the reasons

stated in the judgment referred to supra, the present appeal

is also not maintainable. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Liberty is given to the appellant - Income Tax Department

to present the appeal before the jurisdictional Sessions Court

within a period of two months from the date of this

judgment. It is made clear that period which has been spent

before this Court will not come in the way for considering

the period of limitation, if the appeal is filed before the

jurisdictional Sessions Court within the time noted supra.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

LRS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter