Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.Nagendra B.S vs State By Nandini Layout Police Station
2024 Latest Caselaw 18492 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18492 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri.Nagendra B.S vs State By Nandini Layout Police Station on 25 July, 2024

Author: Shivashankar Amarannavar

Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar

                                                -1-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:29185
                                                          CRL.A No. 1093 of 2024




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1093 OF 2024
                      BETWEEN:

                           SRI NAGENDRA B.S.
                           S/O LATE SHIVALINGAIAH
                           AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
                           RESIDING AT No.26/4
                           15TH MAIN, J.C.NAGARA
                           MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
                           BENGALURU - 560 086.
                                                                  ...APPELLANT

                      (BY SRI PRASHANTH U. T, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by
                      AND:
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
                      1.   STATE BY NANDINI LAYOUT POLICE STATION
COURT OF                   NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096.
KARNATAKA
                           REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                           HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                           BENGALURU - 560 001.

                      2.   SRI RANGAIAH
                           S/O. LATE THIMMAIAH
                           AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
                           RESIDING AT No. 106
                           35TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS
                           RAVI LAYOUT, JAI MARUTHINAGAR
                           NANDINI LAYOUT
                           BENGALURU - 560 096.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS

                      (BY SRI RANGASWAMY R, HCGP FOR R1
                       R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:29185
                                    CRL.A No. 1093 of 2024




      THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST
(POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 15.05.2024 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.No.3913/2024, ON THE
FILE OF HON'BLE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND    SPECIAL    JUDGE,   AT  BENGALURU    (CCH-31)    AND
CONSEQUENTLY ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN
CR.No.139/2024 REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT - POLICE
FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 324, 504 AND
506 OF IPC R/W SECTION 3(1)(s) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 1989 AND
ETC.,

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS               THIS   DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:     HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR



                      ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)

1. This appeal is filed by the sole accused praying to

set aside the order dated 15.05.2024 passed in Crl.Misc. No.

3913/2024 by the LXX Additional City Civil and Sessions

Judge and Special Judge, Bengaluru where under the bail

petition of the appellant - accused sought in respect of crime

No. 139/2024 of Nandini Layout Police Station registered for

offence under Sections 504, 506, 324 of IPC and Sections

3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes

NC: 2024:KHC:29185

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as the

SC ST (POA) Act) came to be rejected.

2. Heard learned counsel for appellant - accused and

learned HCGP for respondent No. 1 - State. Inspite of service

of notice, respondent No. 2 remained absent and

unrepresented.

3. Case of the prosecution is that there were quarrels

between the appellant - accused and respondent No. 2 with

regard to drawing of water from the Corporation tap with the

help of a motor and on 21.04.2024 at about 02.00 pm, the

appellant - accused assaulted respondent No. 2 with a

hammer on his head and caused injury and abused him by

taking the name of his caste. This appellant - accused came to

be arrested on 21.04.2024 and he is in judicial custody. The

appellant - accused filed a petition under Section 439 of

Cr.P.C. and the same came to be rejected by the impugned

order which is challenged in this appeal.

4. The bail petition of the appellant - accused came

to be rejected as charge-sheet was not filed. Now the learned

counsel for appellant submits that charge-sheet has been filed

NC: 2024:KHC:29185

and case is registered in Spl.C.C. No. 1077/2024. Charge-

sheet has been filed against this appellant - accused for

offence under Sections 324, 504 and 506 of IPC and Sections

3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC ST (POA) Act. The offences

alleged against the appellant - accused are not punishable

with either death or imprisonment for life. The wound

certificate will indicate that respondent No. 2 had sustained

simple injuries. As charge-sheet has been filed the appellant -

accused is not required for custodial interrogation. Therefore,

the appellant - accused has made out grounds for setting

aside the impugned order and grant of bail.

5. In the result the following

O R D ER

The appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated

15.05.2024 passed in Crl.Misc. No. 3913/2024 by the LXX

Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge,

Bengaluru is set aside. The appellant - accused is granted bail

in crime No. 139/2024 of Nandini Layout Police Station

subject to the following conditions:

NC: 2024:KHC:29185

i. The appellant - accused shall execute a personal

bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for

the likesum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

ii. The appellant - accused shall not tamper the

prosecution witnesses.

iii. The appellant - accused shall not threaten the

complainant and other prosecution witnesses.

iv. The appellant - accused shall appear before the trial

Court on all dates of hearing unless exempted and

cooperate in speedy disposal of the case.

v. The appellant - accused shall not commit any similar

offence till disposal of the case registered against

him.

Sd/-

(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

LRS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter