Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Govindraj vs H P Sundar Raj
2024 Latest Caselaw 18434 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18434 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Govindraj vs H P Sundar Raj on 24 July, 2024

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                                   -1-
                                                               NC: 2024:KHC:29193
                                                              RFA No. 913 of 2024




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                                 BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                            REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.913 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ)
                       BETWEEN:

                       GOVINDRAJ,
                       S/O. LAXMAIAH,
                       AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
                       R/AT NO.69, 11TH CROSS,
                       INDIRANAGAR, 1ST STAGE
                       BENGALURU - 560 038.
                                                                     ...APPELLANT
                       (BY MS. ADITI AJAY FOR
                           SRI. AJAY GOVINDRAJ.,ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       1.    H. P. SUNDAR RAJ,
                             S/O. LATE H. PUTTALINGASHETTY,
                             AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
Digitally signed by
SUMITHRA R                   R/AT BEHIND SATHYANARAYANA
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA                 SWAMY TEMPLE, HIRIYUR,
                             CHITRADURGA - 572 143.

                       2.    H. S. SRINIVAS,
                             S/O. H. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY,
                             AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
                             R/AT VENKATESHWARA STORES,
                             OPP OLD POLICE STATION,
                             MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR,
                             CHITRADURGA - 572 143.
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC:29193
                                      RFA No. 913 of 2024




3.   H.P. SATHYAMURTHY RAJ,
     SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LRS,
     PRASHANTHA,
     AGED MAJOR,
     R/AT GAJANANA ENTERPRISES,
     MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR,
     CHITRADURGA - 572 143.

4.   SURENDRA S.,
     S/O. H. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY,
     AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
     R/AT VENKATSHWARA STORES,
     OPP OLD POLICE STATION,
     MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR,
     CHITRADURGA - 572 143.

5.   VAGDEVI VIDYA SAMSTHE,
     LAKKAVVANAHALLI ROAD,
     HIRIYUR - 572 143.
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
     VISWAM NAGARAJ
                                          ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. .,ADVOCATE)

      THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
29.02.2024 PASSED IN OS.NO.12/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIRIYUR, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION AND ETC.,

      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                               -3-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:29193
                                           RFA No. 913 of 2024




                       ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)

The office objection raised is that in the suit before

the Trial Court the appellant-plaintiff has valued the

subject matter of the property at Rs.5,15,000/- and the

suit was dismissed. Therefore, the appellant-plaintiff has

preferred an appeal.

2. The appellant-plaintiff himself has made

valuation of Rs.5,15,000/-. Therefore, the Registry is

correct in raising the office objection hence, the appeal

dismissed as not maintainable before this Court.

3. However, liberty is reserved to file appeal

before the appropriate Court having jurisdiction.

4. The benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act,

is given to the appellant-plaintiff for the purpose of

calculation of limitation period.

Sd/-

(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter