Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18406 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:29034-DB
WA No. 1383 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1383 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MAHANTHESHA M
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
S/O SRI MALLAPPA
R/AT A.K. COLONY,
TURVANUR VILLAGE AND POST,
CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI S. THYAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BENGALURU WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD
Digitally 1ST FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN,
signed by K.G. ROAD
PRABHAKAR BENGALURU - 560 009
SWETHA REPRESENTED BY ITS
KRISHNAN CHAIRMAN AND APPOINTMENT AUTHORITY
Location: ...RESPONDENT
High Court of (BY SRI B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE)
Karnataka
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS PERTAINING TO W.P.No.1553/2022, PERUSE THE SAME
AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.06.2023 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, IN W.P.No.1553/2022 AND
CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AS PRAYED WITH
COSTS AND GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDER, RELIEF AS DEEMED
FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS WRIT APPEAL.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:29034-DB
WA No. 1383 of 2023
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
N.V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA)
Heard learned advocate Mr. S. Thyagaraja for the appellant
and learned advocate Mr. B.L. Sanjeev for the respondent.
2. The challenge in this writ appeal is directed against the
judgment and order dated 22.06.2023 of learned Single Judge,
whereby learned Single Judge taking into account the pendency of
the criminal case in Crime No.86 of 2021 before the competent
criminal court, refused to entertain the writ petition of the petitioner
observing that the parties shall endeavour before the competent
criminal court for early disposal of the said criminal case. It was
further observed that the petitioner has already been relieved from
office as per the order dated 06.01.2022.
3. In the background, it was a case put forth by the petitioner
that pursuant to an invite of applications by the respondent-the
NC: 2024:KHC:29034-DB
Bengaluru Water Supply and Sewerage Board, the petitioner
applied for the post of Assistant, whose name figured as selected
candidate under the Schedule Caste category. In support of the
caste status, the petitioner produced Educational Certificates
issued by Dr. C.V.Raman University, Chhattisgarh, where from the
petitioner had graduated.
3.1 It appears that in the process of verification of genuineness
and confirmation of the certificates, the respondent-Board doubted
the veracity thereof since the same was furnished in Hindi and
English language. It was stated that the respondent-Board had
made correspondence to the said Dr. C.V.Raman University
seeking confirmation. The respondent-Board came to the
conclusion that the petitioner had misled and cheated the Board for
the purpose of gaining employment.
3.2 The Board lodged forgery complaint before the Police Station
concerned on 24.05.2021 against the petitioner. The police had
registered Crime No.86 of 2021 alleging the offences under
Sections 420, 465, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
NC: 2024:KHC:29034-DB
3.3 The said criminal proceedings are pending. It was stated that
in the said criminal proceedings, the police initially filed 'C'
summary report. However, the respondent-Board has filed the
protest petition before the competent criminal court.
4. The prayer in the writ petition was to set aside the
memorandum dated 06.01.2022, whereby the appointment of the
petitioner was cancelled on the ground of production and genuine
certificate. The petitioner further prayed to confirm the appointment.
5. When the criminal proceedings are pending in relation to
certification of the petitioner which was the foundation for securing
the employment, the order of learned Single Judge in not giving
relief to the petitioner at this stage and disposing of the writ petition
by observations as above including to dispose of the criminal case
expeditiously could hardly be faulted.
6. No ground is made out to interfere with the judgment and
order of learned Single Judge.
7. The appeal stands meritless and is dismissed.
NC: 2024:KHC:29034-DB
In view of dismissal of the appeal, the interlocutory
applications would not survive and they stand accordingly disposed
of.
Sd/-
(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(K V ARAVIND) JUDGE
KPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!