Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15670 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:25007
RFA No. 1093 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2024 (RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. VITHU BAYI,
W/O D. BHASKAR,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT NO.187, II MAIN ROAD,
KEMPEGOWDANAGAR,
EXTENSION BYADARAHALLI,
NEAR ST, YASH PUBLIC SCHOOL,
MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
BENGALURU-560 091.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NEHRU P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by
SUMITHRA R 1. SMT. SOWBHAGYA,
Location: High W/O INDUSHEKAR,,
Court of Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/AT KEMPASAGARA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,
PIN CODE-562 120.
2. MR. D. BHASKAR
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT NO.187, II MAIN ROAD,
KEMPEGOWDANAGAR
EXTENSION BYADARAHALLI,
NEAR ST, YASH PUBLIC SCHOOL
MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:25007
RFA No. 1093 of 2024
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
BENGALURU-560 091.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.01.2024
PASSED IN RA NO. 80/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,
BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2018 PASSED IN OS
NO. 1012/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL
JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant/defendant No.2 under
Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, calling in question the judgment and decree
dated 10.01.2024 passed in R.A..No.80/2018 by the Principal
Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru.
2. There is judgment and decree passed in the original
suit, which was reversed by the First Appellate Court in
R.A.No.80/2018. Therefore, the instant appeal filed under
Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is not
maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not
maintainable.
NC: 2024:KHC:25007
3. Liberty is reserved to prefer the appropriate appeal
as per law before the Competent Court of law.
4. A period spent in prosecuting this appeal is
excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for the
purpose of calculating the limitation period.
5. The certified copies produced in this appeal shall be
returned to the appellant by placing a photocopy of the same at
cost of the appellant.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KTY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!