Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15659 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:25753
RSA No. 1003 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1003 OF 2014 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. GURUSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
S/O BASAPPA,
2. SMT. GURUSHANTHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
W/O GURUSWAMY,
NOW BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
KODAGANAPURA VILLAGE,
SHIGAVADI DHAKALE,
BEGUR HOBLI,
GUNLDUPET TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 111.
Digitally signed
by
NARAYANAPPA ...APPELLANTS
LAKSHMAMMA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF (BY SMT. GURUSHANTHAMMA., ADVOCATE, FOR A2 ABSENT.)
KARNATAKA
(APPELLANT NO.1 IS DEAD. V/O DATED 29.08.2023 APPEAL
ABATES AS AGAINST APPELLANT NO.1.)
AND:
1. SRI. D. NAGAMALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
S/O DODDABELLAPPA,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:25753
RSA No. 1003 of 2014
2. SRI. CHANNABASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
S/O DODDABELLAPPA,
3. SMT. THAYAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
D/O DODDABELLAPPA,
4. SMT. NEELAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
W/O SRI. SUBBANNA,
5. SRI. CHANNABASAVADEVARU,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
S/O SUBBANNA,
6. SMT. NEELAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
D/O SUBBANNA,
7. SRI. SHEKARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
S/O SUBBANNA,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
KABBAHALLI, VILLAGE,
BEGUR HOBLI, GUNDLUPET TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571 111.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R.C.NAGARAJ., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO 7.)
(V/O DATED 29.08.2023 APPEAL ABATES AS AGAINST R1)
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:25753
RSA No. 1003 of 2014
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLII RULE 1 AND 2
SECTION 100 F THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, SET ASIDE THE JUDMENT
AND DECREE DATED 25.04.2014 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT
JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR IN R.A.NO.3/2009 AND SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.11.2008 PASSED BY
IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND C.J.M AT
CHAMARAJANAGAR IN O.S.NO.49/2003 AND ALLOW THIS
APPEAL AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. Despite order dated 19.06.2024, neither appellants
present nor an arrangement is made for being
represented. It appears that the appellants are not
interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RMS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!