Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Renukamma W/O Basavantappa Angadi vs Rafi Ahamed S/O Mahaboobasab Timmapur
2024 Latest Caselaw 15258 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15258 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Renukamma W/O Basavantappa Angadi vs Rafi Ahamed S/O Mahaboobasab Timmapur on 2 July, 2024

                                                 -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032
                                                         MFA No. 100369 of 2017




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100369 OF 2017 (MV-I)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SMT. RENUKAMMA W/O. BASAVANTAPPA ANGADI,
                   AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: VEGETABLE VENDOR,
                   R/O. TALIYAL NOW AT MITTALKODA,
                   TQ: KUSHTAGI, DIST: KOPPAL.
                                                                     ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. A. B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
                   AND:

                   1.   SRI. RAFI AHAMED S/O. MAHABOOBASAB TIMMAPUR,
                        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: DRIVER,
                        R/O: RAMPUR, (BEHIND-OP), TQ & DIST: BAGALKOT.
                   2.   SRI. RANGAPPA S/O. HANUMAPPA MUCHALAGUDDA,
                        AGED ABOUT MAJOR, OCC: OWNER OF THE
                        OFFENDING VEHICLE BEARING NO.KA-29/8753,
                        R/O: YARAGOPPA S.B, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
Digitally signed
by MANJANNA        3.   THE MANAGER,
E
                        IFFCO-TOKIO, GENERAL INSURNCE CO. LTD,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                BHAVI ARCHEDA, NEAR BASAVESHWARA CIRCLE,
KARNATAKA               NEW-COTTON MARKET, HUBBALLI,
                        TQ: HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD.
                                                               ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI. SUBHASH J. BADDI, ADV. FOR R3;
                        NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH;
                        NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)

                        THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF THE M.V. ACT, PRAYING TO
                   ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY MODIFY THE JUDGMENT
                   AND AWARD DTD: 20/08/2016, PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL
                                    -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032
                                          MFA No. 100369 of 2017




 JUDGE AND M.A.C.T, AT: KUSHTAGI, IN M.V.C NO.10/2015, BY
 ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED IN THE CLAIM
 PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
 COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                         JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and

respondents on admission. With the consent of learned

counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final

disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This appeal is filed by the claimant aggrieved by

the judgment and award dated 20.08.2016 passed in MVC

No.10/2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Kushtagi, (for short 'the

Tribunal'), whereby the Tribunal awarded a compensation

of Rs.40,436/- to the claimant.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are

referred to as they are referred to in the claim petition

before the Tribunal.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

4. The claim petition was filed seeking

compensation on account of injuries suffered by the

claimant in the road traffic accident that took place on

01.03.2008 at about 7.45 p.m. when the claimant-

Renukawwa W/o Ramanna Byali and Renukamma W/o

Basavantappa Angadi, were waiting for vehicle to go to

their village. At that time, the driver of the offending

vehicle bearing registered No.KA-29/8753 came in a rash

and negligent manner and dashed to the claimant and

another. Due to the said impact, they sustained grievous

injuries. Immediately, they were shifted to Kerudi Hospital

Bagalkot, where they were took treatment as inpatient. The

first informant lodged the complaint. This leads to

registration of FIR and investigation.

5. The tribunal considering the evidence on record

at Exs-P.1 to P.22 and oral evidence of PWs.1 and 2,

granted compensation of Rs.40,436/- to the claimant.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

6. Learned counsel for the appellant/claimant

submits that the tribunal has failed to consider the injuries

sustained by the claimant and the amount that was spent

towards treatment. The injuries sustained by the claimant

are grievous in nature, but the tribunal has failed to grant

reasonable amount for the said injuries. He further

submitted that the compensation that was granted by the

tribunal was not just and reasonable one and the tribunal

has not granted fair compensation on the heads 'pain and

suffering', 'loss of income during laid up period', 'future

medical expenses', 'loss of future income' and 'loss of

amenities'. Hence, he prayed to allow the appeal.

7. Learned counsel for respondent No.3/Insurance

Company submits that the Tribunal considering the medical

evidence as well as oral evidence and other aspects has

granted reasonable compensation to the claimant. He

submitted that no grounds are made out seeking for

enhancement of compensation.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

8. As there is no dispute regarding the injuries

sustained by the claimant in the road traffic accident that

occurred on 01.03.2008 due to rash and negligent driving

by the driver of the offending vehicle bearing registered

No.KA-29/8753 by its driver and liability of the insurer of

the offending vehicle, the only point that arises for Court's

consideration in the appeal is:-

"Whether the quantum of compensation awarded by the tribunal is just and proper or does it call for interference for enhancement?

9. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for

the parties and perusing the judgment and award of the

tribunal, I am of the view that the compensation awarded

by the tribunal is not just and reasonable, it is on the lower

side and hence, it requires to be enhanced.

10. As per Ex-P.15-wound certificate, the claimant

sustained the following injuries:-

1. Lacerated Wound 2 ½ cm. Upper lip.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

2. Abrasion over left Maxillery.

3. Abrasion over right hand.

4. Undisplaced Fracture Scapulea Right wrist.

11. As per the opinion of the Doctor, injuries Nos.1

to 3 are simple in nature and injury No.4 is grievous in

nature. The claimant was treated as inpatient from

01.03.2008 till 15.03.2008 i.e., for a period of 15 days. The

injuries sustained and the treatment taken by the claimant

is also supported by the oral evidence of claimant and also

supported by the documentary evidence of Ex.P.15-Wound

certificate.

12. In this case, the Tribunal has observed that the

claimant has sustained three simple injuries. For one

grievous injury, as per the settled law, the claimant is

entitled for a sum of Rs.40,000/- and additional fracture,

she is entitled for a sum Rs.10,000/-. For simple injury,

the claimant is entitled for Rs.5,000/-. Therefore, the

claimant is entitled for Rs.55,000/- under the head 'pain

and sufferings'.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

13. The Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation towards 'loss of income during laid up

period'. The nature of injuries suggest that she must have

been under rest and treatment for a period of three months

and therefore, a sum of Rs.12,750/- (Rs.4,250/- x 3) is

awarded under the said head, considering the notional

income at the rate of Rs.4,250/- per month, in view of

circular issued by Karnataka State Legal Services Authority,

Bengaluru.

14. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.5,436/-

towards 'medical expenses', which is reasonable amount

and no interference in that regard is called for by this

Court.

15. The Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation under the head 'food, Conveyance,

Nourishment and Attendant Charges' etc. Hence, a sum of

Rs.10,000/- is granted under said head.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

16. The Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation under the head 'loss of amenities'. Hence, a

sum of Rs.10,000/- is granted under said head.

17. Thus, the claimant is entitled for the following

compensation:-

Sl.

                                                 Compensation
      No            Description
                                                  awarded by
       .
       1   Pain and sufferings                         55,000/-
       2   Loss of income during laid up
           period                                      12,750/-
       3 Medical Expenses                               5,436/-
       4 Food        and      nourishment,
           attendant      charges     and
           Traveling expenses                          10,000/-
       7 Loss of amenities                             10,000/-
                      Total                           93,186/-

Less : compensation awarded by the Tribunal 40,436/-

Enhanced by this Court 52,750/-

18. The claimant is entitled to a total compensation

of Rs.93,186/- as against Rs.40,436/- awarded by the

tribunal. Accordingly, I pass the following:

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

ORDER

i. The appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii. The judgment and award dated 20.08.2016 passed by Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kushtagi, in MVC No.10/2015 is modified to the extent stated hereinabove.

iii. The claimant is entitled for an additional enhanced compensation of Rs.52,750/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of its realization.

iv. Respondent - Insurance Company shall deposit the enhanced compensation together with interest within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

v. The apportionment and disbursement of the enhanced compensation shall be as per the order of the tribunal.

vi. Draw the modified award accordingly.

- 10 -

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9032

vii. Registry to transmit a copy of this judgment to the concerned Tribunal, along with its records.

viii. No order as to costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

AC/ct-an

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter