Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 961 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:452
RPFC No. 200059 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 200059 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
VITHAL S/O BASANNA HADAPAD,
AGE : 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS (OPTICAL SHOP),
R/O JYOTI OPTICALS, NEAR SBI,
OPP. GOVT HIGH SCHOOL, CHITTAPUR,
DIST. KALABURAGI - 585 211.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOPALKRISHNA B.YADAV, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ERAMMA @ KAVITA W/O VITHAL HADPAD,
AGE : 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O H. NO.1-891/90/123, "SRI MAILAR NIVAS",
Digitally
signed by SANTOSH COLONY, UDNOOR ROAD,
SACHIN
Location:
KALABURAGI - 585 101.
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA 2. KUM. ANANTYA D/O VITHAL HADPAD,
AGE : 8 YEARS, MINOR, U/G OF NATURAL
MOTHER - RESPONDENT NO.1.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUDHEER KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S. 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS
ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION BY
SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 29.03.2022
PASSED BY THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT KALABURAGI
IN CRL. MISC. NO.36/2020 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS
THE PETITION OR REMAND THE MATTER FILED BY
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:452
RPFC No. 200059 of 2022
RESPONDENTS HEREIN, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing order
dated 29.03.2022 in Crl.Misc.No.36/2022 on the file of
Principal Judge, Family Court at Kalabluargi.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner herein that
the he has been placed exparte and fair opportunity has
not been extended to the petitioner.
4. Having taken note of the submission made by
the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
finding recorded by the Family Court would indicate that
the notice issued by the Family Court has been served to
the petitioner herein, however he fails to appear before
the Court below.
5. Perusal of the finding recorded by the Family
Court would indicate that there is no dispute with regard
NC: 2024:KHC-K:452
to the marriage solemnized between the petitioner with
respondent No.1 herein. In their wedlock, a female child is
born - respondent no.2.
6. Perusal of the finding recorded by the Family
Court would indicate that the petitioner is running a optical
shop in the name of 'Jyothi Opticals' and the said aspect
has not been countered, as the petitioner herein has not
appeared before the Court. In that view of the matter,
taking into account the destitute life of the respondents
herein, I am of the view that the award of maintenance by
the Family Court is just and proper and it does not call for
interference. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to deposit
the amount.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!