Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kumari Shobha D/O Shivalingayya ... vs The Managing Director
2024 Latest Caselaw 226 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 226 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Kumari Shobha D/O Shivalingayya ... vs The Managing Director on 3 January, 2024

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                                 -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC-D:147
                                                          MFA No. 24555 of 2011




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
                         MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.24555 OF 2011 (MV-I)
                        BETWEEN:

                        KUMARI SHOBHA,
                        D/O. SHIVALINGAYYA SATTURMATH,
                        AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
                        R/O: VAKKALAGERI ONI,
                        NEAR GELIYARA BALAGA ONI,
                        GADAG.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                        (BY SMT. ANURADHA DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)

                        AND:

                        THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
                        AND ITS SELF INSURANCE FUND,
                        NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD,
                        HUBLI.

           Digitally                                             ...RESPONDENT
           signed by
           BHARATHI H   (BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
BHARATHI   M
HM         Date:
           2024.01.22
           16:30:39
                             THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
           +0530
                        SECTION 173(1) OF M.V. ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
                        AND AWARD DATED 26/02/2011, PASSED IN M.V.C.
                        NO.176/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND
                        MEMBER, MACT, GADAG, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
                        PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
                        OF COMPENSATION.

                            THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
                        ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                             -2-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:147
                                     MFA No. 24555 of 2011




                       JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsels Smt. Anuradha Deshpande

and Smt. Veena Hegde for the parties.

2. Present appeal is filed for seeking enhancement of

compensation, by the claimant, challenging the judgment

and award passed in MVC No.176/2003 dated 26.02.2011.

3. Facts in brief for disposal of the appeal are as under:

3.1 Claimant was a student of First PUC proceeding on

bicycle. A that juncture, a KSRTC Bus bearing No.KA-31/F-

340 came from the opposite side on 08.07.2003 near

KVSR college and dashed against her whereby she fell

down and sustained grievous injuries. She was shifted to

Government Hospital Gadag and for higher treatment she

was taken to KIMS Hospital Hubballi wherein she was

inpatient for a period of 9 days from 08.07.2003 to

17.07.2003. She has been treated in the KIMS hospital

Hubballi and she was cured of the injuries.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:147

4. Ex.P.14 is the disability certificate wherein the doctor

has opined that the injured has sustained disability to the

extent of 18% to 20% to the whole body. PW.4 is

Panchaxarappa Maragi who worked as specialist in the

District Hospital Gadag, he has stated that because of

disability suffered by the claimant, her future prospects

has been put to jeopardy.

5. Taking note of the material evidence placed on

record, as the law existed then, learned trial judge has

allowed the compensation in a sum of Rs.1,00,796/- with

interest at 6% per annum.

6. No further evidence is forthcoming on record as to

what is the present status of the claimant.

7. At the time of the accident, she was aged about 16

years according to the counsel for appellant. If that is so,

she must be 37 years as of now and she would have been

married and settled in the life.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:147

8. However, taking note of the fact that there was a

disability to the extent of 18 to 20% to the whole body,

tribunal has assessed the disability at 15%. As such,

enhancing the compensation by another sum of

Rs.50,000/- globally with interest to be paid from the date

of petition till realization would meet the ends of justice

without further discussion on the merits of matter.

9. Accordingly, the following:-

ORDER

i) Appeal is allowed in part.

ii) As against compensation amount of Rs.1,79,000/-, claimant would be entitled to Rs.1,50,796/- with interest at 6% from the date of petition till realization.

iii) The balance amount shall be deposited by the KSRTC within a period of 6 weeks from today.

Sd/-

JUDGE

HMB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter