Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 211 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:60-DB
MFA No.200694 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200694 OF 2019 (FC)
BETWEEN:
DEEPAK S/O KUBER MANE
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
R/O KUBER TAILOR,
OLD KUMBAR GALLI,
AZAD ROAD, NEAR OLD CANARA BANK,
VIJAYAPURA - 58 6101.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI BASAVARAJ R. MATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by
SWETA KULKARNI SHUBHANGI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
W/O DEEPAK MANE
AGE: 29 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O C/O SHIVAJI A MORE,
GANESHWADI, TAL-MANGALWEDHA,
DIST. SOLAPUR, MAHARASHTRA - 413 305.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SANJEEV KUMAR C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE
FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.03.2019 PASSED BY THE
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:60-DB
MFA No.200694 of 2019
PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, VIJAYAPURA IN M.C.NO.104/2017
IN RESPECT OF DISMISSAL OF DIVORCE PETITION AND
PLEASED TO ALLOW THE M.C.CASE AND DISSOLVE THE
MARRIAGE OF APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY
B.M.SHYAM PRASAD J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the petitioner in
M.C.No.104/2017 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family
Court, Vijayapura seeking dissolution of marriage under
Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is
dismissed.
The learned counsels for the parties have stated before
this Court on 07.11.2023 that the parties have settled their
disputes and are living together. Sri Basavaraj R. Math, the
learned counsel for the appellant, reiterates the same even
today but submits that he is not able to secure definite
instructions in writing because the parties, as informed by
his counterpart, have re-settled elsewhere.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:60-DB
The records are perused and the submissions are
considered. This Court is of the considered view that if the
parties have settled their dispute and are living in harmony,
the appeal need not be kept pending and must be disposed
of but with liberty to the appellant, if the circumstances so
justify, to file necessary application for restoration of the
appeal. Hence, the following:
ORDER
The appeal stands disposed of for the
reasons as aforesaid but with liberty to the
appellant, subject to all just exceptions, to file
application for recall of this order if circumstances
so justify.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
BL
CT;VK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!