Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manappuram Finance Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 1515 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1515 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Manappuram Finance Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 January, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                             -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:2413
                                                       WP No. 1022 of 2024




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024

                                          BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                      WRIT PETITION NO. 1022 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
                BETWEEN:

                MANAPPURAM FINANCE LTD.,
                HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                MANAPPURAM HOUSE, A.O.VALAPAD
                TRISSUR DISTRICT
                KERALA HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH AT
                MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED K.R.ROAD
                BANASHANKARI II STAGE
                BUILDING NO.4, 1ST FLOOR, 27TH CROSS
                SANKRANTHI COMPLEX
                OPP. SEVAKSETHRA HOSPITAL
                BENGALURU DT PIN - 560 070.
                REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
                AND AREA HEAD MANAGER MR. ASHOK
                                                              ...PETITIONER
Digitally signed by (BY SRI. POORNA PRASAD K. R., ADVOCATE)
PADMAVATHI B K
Location: HIGH
COURT OF            AND:
KARNATAKA
                1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      BY ITS SECRETARY
                      HOME DEPARTMENT
                      VIDHANA SOUDHA
                      BENGALURU - 560 001.

                2.    DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OFFICE
                      NEXT TO SURANA COLLEGE, SOUTH END CIRCLE
                      JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE, INDIA
                               -2-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:2413
                                         WP No. 1022 of 2024




     KARNATAKA - 560 070.

3.   THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
     BASAVANAGUDI POLICE STATION,
     K.R.ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI
     NEAR GANDHI BAZAR
     BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560 004.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP)

    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH NOTICE ISSUED U/S 91 OF THE CRPC DTD 06.01.2024
TO THE PETITIONER BY THE R3 AND FURNISHED AS
ANNEXURE-E.

    THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                             ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question a

police notice under Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. dated 06.01.2024.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

would submit that the identical issue is answered by a

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WP.No.10754/2023.

3. The learned High Court Government Pleader would

also admit position that the issue stands answered by the

judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench. The Co-ordinate

Bench has held as follows:

NC: 2024:KHC:2413

"The subject matter of this Writ Petition is substantially similar to the one in W.P.No.22441/2022 (GM-Police) between M/S.MUTHOOT FINANCE LTD., VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA disposed off by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 15.11.2022, wherein paragraph nos. 2 & 3 of the said judgment reads as under:

"2. A perusal of the order passed on 14.10.2022,the notice does not in effect indicate anything contrary to what is passed. The only observation is that the writ petition is dismissed and therefore, the gold articles are directed to be produced for investigation. This Court has permitted production of gold articles for investigation, but the Investigating Officer cannot seize the same.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is co-operating with the investigation and indication of dismissal of the petition should not lead to seizure of the gold articles. This Court has clearly held that the gold articles cannot be seized and therefore, the Investigating Officer cannot seize the gold articles, but can examine the same by summoning it for the purpose of investigation."

2. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. 932-933/1974 between A.V.VINODA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY disposed of on 11.12.1974, has held that the Court should treat the like-cases alike and if relief is granted to a litigant it has to be extended to a similarly circumstanced litigant as well, there being no derogatory circumstances.

In view of the above, relief granted to the litigant in the cognate Writ Petition is extended to the Petitioner herein as well, mutantis mutandis.

No costs."

NC: 2024:KHC:2413

In the light of the issue standing answered, the petitioner

is entitled to the same relief that is granted by

Co-ordinate Bench.

Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NVJ

CT:SS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter