Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Channabasayya S/O Basayya Hiremath vs Shivanand G Hiremath
2024 Latest Caselaw 1138 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1138 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Channabasayya S/O Basayya Hiremath vs Shivanand G Hiremath on 12 January, 2024

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty

                                                     -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC-D:793
                                                           CRL.RP No. 100370 of 2023




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                                 DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024

                                                  BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                          CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100370 OF 2023 (397)
                          BETWEEN:

                          CHANNABASAYYA
                          S/O. BASAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 32 YEARS,
                          OCC. AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS,
                          R/O. MOOLIMATH ONI, KALAGHATAGI
                          TQ. KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD-581204.
                                                                        ...PETITIONER
                          (BY SRI PARASHURAM C. SAJJANAR, ADVOCATE)

                          AND:

                          SHIVANAND G. HIREMATH
                          AGE: 45 YEARS,
                          OCC. AGRICULTURE AND SOCIAL SERVICE,
                          R/O. KALAGHATAGI, TQ. KALAGHATAGI,
                          DIST. DHARWAD-581204.
                                                                       ...RESPONDENT
                          (BY SRI KOTRESH V. HUBBALLI, ADVOCATE)

            Digitally
                                THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397
VIJAYALAXMI signed by
M BHAT      VIJAYALAXMI
            M BHAT
                          R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
                          CONVICTION ORDER DATED 16.02.2023 PASSED BY THE III
                          ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPL JUDGE,
                          DHARWAD IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.65/2022, WHEREIN THE
                          APPEAL FILED BY THE ACCUSED/PETITIONER U/.S 374(3) OF
                          CR.P.C IS DISMISSED AND CONFIRMED THE JUDGMENT OF
                          CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL
                          JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KALAGHATAGI DATED 08.04.2022 IN
                          CC    NO.66/2019    WHEREIN    THE    ACCUSED/PETITIONER
                          CONVICTED AND SENTENCED TO PAY FINE OF RS.3,05,000/- IN
                          DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE, HE SHALL UNDERGO SIMPLE
                          IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS AND ACTING U/S
                          357(1)(b) OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IT IS ORDERED
                          THAT, OUT OF THE TOTAL FINE AMOUNT OF RS.3,00,000/-
                                 -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:793
                                      CRL.RP No. 100370 of 2023




(THREE LAKH RUPEES ONLY), SHALL BE PAID TO THE
COMPLAINANT TOWARDS THE COMPENSATION AND THE
REMAINING AMOUNT OF RS.5,000/- (FIVE THOUSAND RUPEES)
SHALL BE REMITTED TO THE STATE.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

1. This revision petition under Section 397 of

Cr.P.C. is filed with a prayer to set aside the judgment and

order of conviction and sentence passed by the Court of

the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kalaghatagi in

C.C.N.66/2019 dated 08.04.2022 and the judgment and

order passed in Crl.Appeal No.65/2022 by the III Addl.

District and Sessions and Special Judge, Dharwad dated

16.02.2023.

2. Learned counsel for the parties at the inception,

submits that, the dispute between the parties has been

amicably settled during the pendency of this revision

petition and the parties have filed a compromise petition

under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. read with Section 147 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act with a prayer to permit them

to compound the offence.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:793

3. The application is taken on record. The same is

signed by the learned counsel for the parties and also by

the parties who are present before the Court and identified

by their learned counsels.

4. In the compromise petition, it is stated that the

petitioner and the respondent have settled their dispute at

the intervention of the well-wishers and family members of

both the parties and the petitioner has paid the entire

amount towards respondent's claim.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent on

instructions submits that, the settlement is towards full

and final settlement of the claim by the respondent in this

case. He submits that the respondent may be permitted to

withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner before

the Trial Court on 24.06.2022.

6. Considering the submission made by the

learned counsel for the parties and also having regard to

the averments made in the compromise petition, I am of

the view that the parties are required to be permitted to

NC: 2024:KHC-D:793

compound the offence punishable under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act for which the petitioner has

been convicted and sentenced by the Courts below.

Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

The parties are permitted to compound the offence

punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act for which the petitioner has been

convicted by the Courts below.

The judgment and order of conviction and sentence

passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kalaghatagi in

C.C.N.66/2019 dated 08.04.2022, confirmed in Crl.Appeal

No.65/2022 by the Court of the III Addl. District and

Sessions and Special Judge, Dharwad vide order dated

16.02.2023, are set aside.

The petitioner is acquitted of the offence punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The

respondent-complainant is permitted to withdraw the

amount deposited by the petitioner before the Trial Court.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:793

In view of the disposal of the petition, pending

Interlocutory application, does not survive for

consideration.

Sd/-

JUDGE

KGK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter