Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1095 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:506
RPFC No. 200062 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 200062 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SHIVARAJ
S/O SADASHI CHAVARE,
AGE: 31 YEARS,
OCC: AGRIL. AND DRIVER,
RESIDENT OF VARATTI COLONI,
HIPPARGI, TALUK RABKAVI BANHATTI,
DISTRICT BAGALKOT-587101.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANGANABASAVA B PATIL,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. GOURAMMA
@ GOURI W/O SHIVARAJ CHAVARE,
AGE: 30 YEARS,
Digitally OCC: STUDENT AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
signed by
SACHIN R/O OF SAI PARK NEAR YALLAVVA TEMPLE,
Location:
HIGH VIJAYAPURA 586101.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
2. NAMRATA
D/O SHIVARAJ CHAVARE,
AGE: 5 YEARS, OCC:NIL,
SINCE PETITIONER NO. 2 IS MINOR,
R/BY NATURAL MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHIVASHANKAR H MANNUR , ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE
FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO THIS HONOURABLE COURT
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:506
RPFC No. 200062 of 2023
TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS. AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 24.01.2023 IN
CRL.MISC.NO.385/2022 PASSED BY THE JUDGE, FAMILY
COURT AT VIJAYAPUR BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE SAID
REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition is filed by the respondent in
Crl.Misc.No.385 of 2022 on the file of Principal Judge
Family Court, Vijayapura, granting maintenance to the
respondents.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
parties.
3. Having taken note of the submission made
by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
and the finding recorded by the Family Court would
indicate that, the marriage of the petitioner herein
with the respondent No.1 was solemnized on
NC: 2024:KHC-K:506
19.02.2017 and in their wedlock respondent No.2 is
born.
3. Perusal of the finding recorded by the Family
Court would indicate that, parties are residing
seperately. In view of the finding recorded by the
Family Court at paragraph 10 of the impugned order,
with regard to Exs.P7 and P8 (RTC Extracts), and as
the petitioner herein has not countered the said
documents and therefore, I am of the opinion that,
the maintenance granted by the Family Court is just
and proper and does not call for interference in this
petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE SB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!