Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Divisional Manager vs Mahammed Sadik S/O Rehamansab Hosamani
2024 Latest Caselaw 1090 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1090 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Divisional Manager vs Mahammed Sadik S/O Rehamansab Hosamani on 11 January, 2024

Author: Suraj Govindaraj

Bench: Suraj Govindaraj

                                          -1-
                                                  NC: 2024:KHC-D:694
                                                   WP No. 107649 of 2015




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                      DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
                                        BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
                      WRIT PETITION NO. 107649 OF 2015 (GM-AC)
             BETWEEN:

             THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
             NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
             HUBLI, COOPERATIVE COTTON SALES SOCIETY LIMITED,
             BUILDING OPPOSITE TO BASAVA VANA,
             NEAR SWIMMING POOL, HUBBALLI,
             NOW REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY MANAGER
             NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
             REGIONAL OFFICE, ARIHANTA PLAZA,
             KUSUGAL ROAD, HUBBALLI-23.
                                                           ...PETITIONER
             (BY SRI. S.K. KAYAKMATH, ADVOCATE)

             AND:

             1.   MAHAMMAD SADIK S/O. REHAMANSAB HOSAMANI,
                  AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: FILM OPERATOR,
                  R/O. MYADAR ONI, RON,
                  TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG.

YASHAVANT
             2.   BASAYYA MADIWALAYYA ANGADI,
NARAYANKAR        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
                  R/O. NEAR HEAD POST OFFICE,
Digitally         MUNICIPAL QUARTERS,
signed by
YASHAVANT
NARAYANKAR
                  HOUSE NO. 01, GADAG.
                                                           ...RESPONDENTS
             (NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 IS SERVED)

                    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
             OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF
             CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE COMMON IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
             27.06.2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
             JMFC, RON ON INTERIM APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 170
             OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT FILED BY THE WRIT PETITIONER /
                                 -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:694
                                         WP No. 107649 of 2015




RESPONDENT NO.2 IN MVC NO.43/2014 CLUBBED WITH MVC
44/2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-H.


      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN

'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                             ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following

reliefs:

a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari by quashing the common impugned Order dated 27.06.2015 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ron on Interim Application filed under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act filed by the Writ petitioner/respondent N.2 in MVC No.43/2014 Clubbed with MVC 44/2014 vide ANNEXURE-H, in the interest of justice and equity.

b) Pass any other order/relief, that this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the nature and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. A memo dated 11.01.2024 has been filed, signed by the

counsel for the petitioner, which reads as follows:

"MEMO

Herein advocate for the writ petitioner most respectfully submits as under.

That the petitioner has preferred the aforesaid writ petitions challenging the order passed by Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ron on interim application

NC: 2024:KHC-D:694

filed under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act in MVC No.43/2014 Clubbed with MVC No.44/2014.

That during the pendency of the present writ petition the claim petitions have been allowed. The writ petitioner herein has preferred MFA No.103919/2017 and 103918/2017 against the common judgment and award passed in MVC No.43/2014 and MVC No.44/2014 respectively.

That in view of the disposal of the claim petition during the pendency of this writ petition, the present writ petitions does not survive for consideration.

Therefore, it is humbly prayed that the aforesaid writ petitions be disposed of with the liberty to the writ petitioners to pursue the contentions raised in the present writ petitions to meet the ends of justice and equity."

3. Sri.S.K.Kayakmath, learned counsel for petitioner would

submit that the proceedings in MVC No.43/2014 and MVC

No.44/2014 having been disposed, MFA No.103919/2017

and 103918/2017 have been filed. He seeks permission to

urge the grounds taken up in the above petitions in the

said appeals. Liberty is so reserved and both the petitions

are dismissed for having become infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter