Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Jagadamba vs The Tahsildar
2024 Latest Caselaw 5588 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5588 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Jagadamba vs The Tahsildar on 22 February, 2024

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                         -1-
                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:7387
                                                 WP No. 5321 of 2024




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                     DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                      BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                    WRIT PETITION No.5321 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)
              BETWEEN:

              SMT. JAGADAMBA
              C/O JAYARAMA,
              AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
              R/AT NO.94, POOJAMMA TEMPLE,
              MARASUR, THATTANAHALLI VILLAGE,
              MURSUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK,
              BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 106.
                                                        ...PETITIONER
              (BY SRI ARVIND N, ADVOCATE)
              AND:

              1.    THE TAHSILDAR
                    ANEKAL TALUK,
                    ANEKAL, BANGALORE-562106.

              2.    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
Digitally           BANGALORE SOUTH DIVISION,
signed by R         BANGALORE-560001.
MANJUNATHA
Location:                                            ...RESPONDENTS
HIGH COURT    (BY SRI C.N.MAHADESHWARAN, AGA)
OF
KARNATAKA          THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
              AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
              DIRECTING THE R1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF
              PETITIONER DATED 02/07/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-B FOR
              TRANSFER OF ALL THE REVENUE RECORDS SUCH AS KHATA,
              RTC ETC., IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN WITH
              RESPECT TO SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

                  THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
              HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                -2-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:7387
                                          WP No. 5321 of 2024




                              ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

Learned Additional Government Advocate takes

notice for both the respondents.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that although a

representation dated 02.07.2021 was given to the

Tahsildar, Anekal Taluk, bringing to his notice the

judgment and decree passed by the I Additional Senior

Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal, in O.S.No.81/2021 and

requesting mutation entries accordingly, the Tahsildar has

not passed any orders.

3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits

that even in terms of the judgment and decree, a portion

of the property in Sy.No.58/3 measuring 0-05.00 guntas

out of 22 ½ guntas, situated at Rajapura village, Jigani

Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District, has been given to

petitioner. Therefore, unless 11E sketch is procured by the

petitioner at the hands of Assistant Director of Land

NC: 2024:KHC:7387

Records, Tahsildar will not be in a position to entertain

such an application.

4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that liberty may be reserved to the petitioner to

secure 11E sketch and thereafter file necessary application

before the Tahsildar and direction may be issued to the

Tahsildar to consider same within a time frame.

5. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of

directing the petitioner to approach the Assistant Director

of Land Records, secure 11E sketch in terms of the decree

passed by the Civil Court and submit the same along with

judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court, to the

Tahsildar.

6. If the petitioner approaches the Assistant Director of

Land Records, he shall consider such an application and

issue 11E sketch as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

NC: 2024:KHC:7387

within a period of two months from the date of application

made by the petitioner.

Ordered accordingly.

Four weeks' time is granted to the learned Additional

Government Advocate to file memo of appearance.

Sd/-

JUDGE

kcm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter