Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5237 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
R
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23827 OF 2012 (MV)
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.21188 OF 2013
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23828 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23826 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23829 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23830 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23831 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23832 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23833 OF 2012,
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.25578 OF 2012,
Digitally
signed by
SAMREEN
MFA. CROSS OBJ NO.793 OF 2013,
SAMREEN AYUB
AYUB DESHNUR IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23827 OF 2012 (MV)
DESHNUR Date:
2024.02.23
17:16:20 BETWEEN:
+0530
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. KUMARI SUPRITA ACHARI,
D/O. GAJANAN ACHARI,
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
R/O: HEBBANAKERI, TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. LAXMESH P.MATAGUPPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.195/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.68,250/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.21188 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
KUMARI. SUPRITA ACHARI,
D/O. GAJANAN ACHARI,
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: HEBBANAKERI, TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581345.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. LAXMESH P.MATAGUPPI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581345.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
2. SRI. RAGHAVANDRA NAIK,
S/O. NAGESH NAIK
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
R/O. HEGDE, TQ: KUMATA,
UTTAR KANNADA-581346,
(RC OWNER OF MAHINDRA MAXICAB
BEARING REG. NO.KA-20/4597)
3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KAYKENI ROAD,
KARWAR, UTTAR KANNADA-58130.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.195/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR,(U.K.) PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23828 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. UDAY N.NAIK,
S/O. NARAYAN NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
OCC: AUTO RICKSHWA DRIVER,
2. KUMARI SAMIKSHA UDAY NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT,
-4-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
BOTH ARE R/O. TOPPALAKERI,
TQ: HONNAVAR, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
3. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
R1 SERVED;
R2 IS MINOR R/P BY R1)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.182/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.3,90,000/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23826 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. TULASI KOM SUBRAYA GOUDA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: NILL,
R/O: MADIKOTTIGE, AGRAHAR,
POST: HALDIPUR, TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
-5-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.157/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.2,77,000/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23829 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. LAXMI RAMA PADTI,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
OCC: ANGANAWADI HELPER AND COOLIE,
R/O: KARKI, TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
-6-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.185/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.63,700/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23830 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. GANAPU M.GOUDA S/O. MOLA GOUDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
OCC: COOLIE,
R/O: KONKAR, TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
-7-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.39/2011 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.49,500/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23831 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ABUBAKAR K.BABLU S/O. KASIM BABLU,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
OCC: FISHERMAN,
R/O: VANNALLI, KUMTA,
PRESENTLY R/AT KASARKOD,
TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
-8-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
IN MVC NO.184/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.1,06,000/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23832 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ISUF S.HONNIKAR,
S/O. SULEMAN HONNIKAR,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
OCC: FISHERMAN,
R/O: VANNALLI, KUMTA,
PRESENTLY R/AT KASARKOD,
TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.183/2010 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.11,215/- WITH
-9-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.23833 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD.,
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, REPTD.,
BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. AMRIN RAFIQ SHAH,
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
OCC: TEMPORARY SERVICE,
R/O: NEAR FISH MARKET, HALDIPUR,
TQ: HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
2. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
(R.C. OWNER OF TELCO AMBULANCE
BEARING NO.KA-22/A-8468)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.49/2011 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSTION OF RS.78,200/- WITH
INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION
TILL REALISATION.
- 10 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.25578 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
SMT. AMRIN RAFIQ SHAH,
AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: TEMPORARY SERVICE,
R/O: NEAR FISH MARKET, HALDIPUR,
TQ: HONNAVAR, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
KARWAR.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. T.M. NADAF, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
OWNER OF AMBULANCE NO.KA-30/A-8468.
2. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA NAIK,
S/O. NAGESH NAIK,
AGED: MAJOR,
R/O: HEGDE, KUMTA TALUK,
KARWAR DISTRICT.
RC OWNER OF MAXICAB NO.KA-20/4597
3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
DIVITIONAL OFFICE, KAIKINI ROAD,
KARWAR.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
R1-R2 SERVED)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:18-04-2012 PASSED
IN MVC NO.49/2011 ON THE FILE OF MEMBER, ADDL. M.A.C.T,
HONAVAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSAION.
- 11 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
IN MFA. CROB NO.793 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
SRI. ABUBAKAR S/O. KASIMBABLU,
AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: FISHERMAN,
R/O: VANNALLI, KUMTA,
PRESENTLY R/O. KASARKOD HONNAVAR,
DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.
...CROSS OBJECTOR
(BY SRI. S.L. MATTI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PRESIDENT,
ROTARY CLUB, ANKOLA,
(R.C. OWNER OF AMBULANCE BEARING
NO.KA-30/A-8468)
2. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA NAIK,
S/O. NAGESH NAIK,
R/O: HEGDE, KUMTA TALUK,
(RC OWNER OF MAHINDRA MAXICAB
BEARING NO.KA-20/4597)
3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
DIVITIONAL OFFICE, KAIKINI ROAD,
KARWAR.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA CROB IN MFA No.23831/2012 IS FILED UNDER
ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 18.04.2012 PASSED IN MVC No.184/2010 ON THE FILE OF
THE MEMBER ADDL. MACT, HONNAVAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION.
- 12 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
MFA No. 23827 of 2012
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828
of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No.
23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA
No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012,
MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of
2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
THESE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALS AND MFA. CROB,
COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
These appeals are directed against the judgment and
award passed in MVC Nos.157/2010, 195/2010, 182/2010,
185/2010, 39/2011, 184/2010, 183/2010 and 49/2011
dated 18.04.2011 on the file of Additional Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Honnavar.
2. The following appeals are filed by the Insurance
Company of the Ambulance bearing registration No.KA-
30/6176 challenging the liability of 50% saddled on the
Insurance Company of the Ambulance.
3. Appellant-Insurance Company has also insured
Mahindra Maxicab bearing registration No.KA-20/4597.
4. Appeal numbers in MFA Nos.21188/2013,
25578/2012 and MFA Crob No.793/2013 are by the
- 13 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
claimants who are injured in the said accident seeking for
enhancement of the compensation.
5. Facts of the case in brief for disposal of these
appeals are as under:
5.1. In a road traffic accident occurred on
29.05.2010 involving Mahindra Maxicab bearing
registration No.KA-20/4597 and Ambulance bearing
registration No.KA-30/6176 on NH-7 near Jogimatti, some
persons were injured. The injured persons have laid the
claim in the aforesaid MVC cases.
6. Claim petitions were contested by filing detail
written statements including the non holding effective
driving license on the part of the driver of the Ambulance.
7. The Tribunal, on contest, allowed the claim
petitions in part as under:
- 14 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
Amount awarded by Sl.
MVC No. Name of Claimant Tribunal (in Rs.) No. 1 157/2010 Tulasi Gouda 2,77,000/- 2 195/2010 Kumari Suprita Achari 68,250/- 3 182/2010 Uday Naik and another 3,90,000/- 4 185/2010 Laxmi Padti 63,700/- 5 39/2011 Ganapu Gouda 49,500/- 6 184/2010 Abubakar Bablu 1,06,000/- 7 183/2010 Isuf Honnikar 11,215/- 8 49/2011 Amrin Shah 78,200/-
8. The compensation amount was directed to be
shared the Insurance Company of the Ambulance as well
as the Insurance Company of the Mahindra Maxicab which
is none other than United India Insurance Company
Limited in the ratio of 50:50, though the charge sheet
came to be filed against the driver of the Ambulance.
9. The Tribunal assigned proper reasons that
though the charge sheet is filed against the driver of the
Ambulance, some amount of contributory negligence is
also on the part of driver of the Maxicab as a Ambulance is
- 15 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
required to move swiftly on the road to save a life and
driver of Maxicab should have paved the way for the easy
movement of the Ambulance.
10. Smt. Preeti Shashank, learned counsel
appearing for Insurance Company of the ambulance
however, contended that the driver of the Maxicab did not
possess the valid driving license as it got expired on
24.04.2010 and the renewal of the driving licence was
taken place on 31.05.2010 and the accident has occurred
on 29.05.2010.
11. Therefore, 50% of the liability fastened on to
the Insurance Company of the ambulance is to be shifted
on the owner of the ambulance bearing No.KA-30/6176 and
sought for allowing the appeal.
12. Sri. Laxmesh P. Mataguppi, learned counsel and
Sri.T.M.Nadaf and Sri.S.L.Matti, learned counsel in the
respective appeals of the claimants sought for enhanced
- 16 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
compensation by contending that the quantum of
compensation awarded by the Tribunal having regard to
the injuries sustained by the claimants is on the lower
side.
13. Having heard the parties in detail, this Court
perused the material on record meticulously.
14. On such perusal of the material on record, the
accidental injuries sustained by the claimants is
established by placing oral and documentary evidence on
record.
15. Tribunal has appreciated the nature of the
injuries and applied the principles of law that governed the
field of awarding suitable and adjudged compensation and
allowed the claim petition as referred to supra.
16. However, the Tribunal has taken into
consideration the oral evidence placed on record by the
- 17 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
driver of the ambulance and also taking note of the fact
that the Maxicab driver if slowed down for a while, the
accident would not have occurred at all and has attributed
50% of contributory negligence on the driver of the
Maxicab even though the charge sheet came to be filed
against the driver of the ambulance.
17. It is common knowledge that the ambulance is
required to move swiftly on the road in order to save a
life. Therefore, the drivers of the other vehicles on the
road is expected to pave the way for the easy movement
of the ambulances, fire engines or police vehicles as the
case may be; especially when there is a siren switched
on. It is a basic civic sense. If the maxi cab driver had
slowed down for a while paving the way for the
ambulance, accident would not have occurred at all.
18. Be it what it may. Since the accident has
occurred, the police after thorough investigation, charge
- 18 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
sheeted the driver of the ambulance for having moved on
the wrong side. The driver of ambulance having explained
in his evidence as to why he had to move on the wrong
side of the road, Tribunal was justified in attributing 50%
contributory negligence with the driver of the ambulance
as well as the driver of the Maxicab.
19. What has been ignored by the Tribunal in the
whole process is that as per Ex.R.5, driver of the
ambulance did not have effective driving license as on the
date of accident inasmuch as his licence got expired on
24.04.2010. The same should have been renewed within
a period of 30 days from 24.04.2010. Actual date of
renewal as per the Ex.R.5 is 31.05.2010. Therefore, not
holding the proper driving license exonerates the liability
of the Insurance Company as it is a fundamental breach.
20. At this juncture, learned Advocates for
claimants as well as learned counsel for the owner of the
- 19 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
ambulance vehemently contended that the statute allows
30 days time to renew the driving license and if an
application has been made within 30 days on account of
the procedural delay, the driving license can be extended
beyond 30 days which would enure to the benefit of the
holder of the license as if it has been renewed soon after
the expiry.
21. Such an argument is no doubt an acceptable
argument. But in the case on hand, the owner or the
driver of the ambulance did not place any evidence on
record that soon after the expiry of the driving license
there was an application filed before the RTO within 30
days and the accident has occurred when the said
application was pending for processing at the hands of the
RTO.
22. In the absence of such evidence placed on
record, there is no other alternative for this Court except
- 20 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
to accept the argument put forth on behalf of the
Insurance Company of the ambulance that the driver did
not possess the effective driving license.
23. Accordingly, the saddling of 50% liability on the
Insurance Company of the ambulance needs to be set
aside and said liability needs to be transferred to the
owner of the ambulance.
24. Having said thus, claimants in MFA
No.21188/2013, MFA No.25578/2013 and MFA Crob
No.793/2013 have made out a case for enhanced
compensation having regard to the injuries sustained by
them.
25. Taking note of the fact that the accident is of
the year 2010, reassessing the quantum of compensation
at this distance of time on each and every head would
result in futile exercise. Moreover, the Tribunal has
granted sufficient compensation based on the principles of
- 21 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
law that governed the field of awarding the suitable
compensation.
26. Therefore, in the considered opinion of this
Court, claimant in MFA No.21188/2013, claimant in MFA
No.25578/2013 and MFA Crob No.793/2013 are awarded a
sum of Rs.30,000/- 75,000/- 50,000/- respectively, over
and above the compensation amount already awarded by
the Tribunal globally, would meet the ends of justice.
27. Accordingly, following:
ORDER
i. Appeals filed by the Insurance Company of the
Ambulance in MFA No.23827/2012, MFA
No.23828/2012, MFA No.23826/2012, MFA
No.23829/2012, MFA No.23830/2012, MFA
No.23831/2012, MFA No.23832/2012, MFA
No.23833/2012, are allowed.
- 22 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
ii. 50% of the liability saddled on the Insurance
Company of the ambulance is hereby set aside.
iii. The claimants are entitled to receive the same
from the owner of the ambulance bearing No.KA-
20/4597.
iv. MFA No.21188/2013, MFA No.25578/2012 and
MFA Crob. No.793/2013 are allowed in part and
they are entitled to a sum of Rs.30,000/-
Rs.75,000/- and 50,000/- over and above the
compensation in a sum of Rs.63,700/-,
Rs.78,200/-, Rs.1,06,000/- awarded by the
Tribunal with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of
petition till realisation.
v. It is made clear that even in the enhanced
compensation, the Insurance Company of the
ambulance is not liable to pay 50% of the
- 23 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:4282
C/W MFA No. 21188 of 2013, MFA No. 23828 of 2012, MFA No. 23826 of 2012, MFA No. 23829 of 2012, MFA No. 23830 of 2012, MFA No. 23831 of 2012, MFA No. 23832 of 2012, MFA No. 23833 of 2012, MFA No. 25578 of 2012 AND MFA. CROB No. 793 of 2013
enhanced compensation and it is recoverable from
the owner of the ambulance.
vi. Amount in deposit is ordered to return to the
Appellant/Insurance Company of the Ambulance.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SMM/KAV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!