Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akbar Maktum Hussain Gosanatti vs Shankar Laxman Rathod
2024 Latest Caselaw 4657 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4657 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Akbar Maktum Hussain Gosanatti vs Shankar Laxman Rathod on 15 February, 2024

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                                     -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC-D:3705
                                                               MFA No. 24140 of 2013




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                  BEFORE
                                THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
                            MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.24140 OF 2013 (MV-I)
                       BETWEEN:

                       AKBAR MAKTUM HUSSAIN GOSANATTI,
                       AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: MASON NOW NIL,
                       R/O. GANDHI NAGAR, BELAGAVI.

                                                                           ...APPELLANT
                       (BY SMT. SHAILA BELLIKATTI, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       1.     SHANKAR LAXMAN RATHOD,
                              AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                              R/O. AT POST: 110, NEAR VITHAL
                              MANDIR VASHI, TQ: VALVA,
                              DIST: SANGLI, MAHARASHTRA.
                              (OWNER OF THE MOTOR CYCLE NO. MH-10/AS-1841)

                       2.     SUNIL SAMUEL BANGARI,
                              AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
          Digitally
          signed by
                              R/O. 1B, 113, HARI MANDRI, TOWNSHIP,
SAMREEN
          SAMREEN
          AYUB
                              DANDELI, TQ: HALIYAL, DIST: KARWAR.
AYUB      DESHNUR             (OWNER OF THE MOTOR CYCLE NO.KA-31/L-5788)
DESHNUR   Date:
          2024.02.23
          16:31:14
          +0530                                                       ...RESPONDENTS
                       (BY SRI. PRANAV S.KATAGERI, ADVOCATE FOR
                           SRI. S.S. KATAGERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                           R2 APPEAL STANDS ABATED)

                            THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
                       JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:31-07-2013 PASSED IN MVC
                       NO.2399/2011 ON THE FILE OF VI-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
                       JUDGE, BELAGAVI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
                       COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

                            THIS M.F.A., COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
                       COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                 -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:3705
                                        MFA No. 24140 of 2013




                          JUDGMENT

Heard Smt.Shaila Bellikatti, Sri.Pranav S.Katageri for

Sanjay S.Katageri.

2. Though the matter is listed for admission, with the

consent of the parties, matter is taken up for final

disposal.

3. Claimant in a road traffic accident that occurred on

29.03.2011 involving motorcycle bearing No.KA-31/L-

5788, another motorcycle bearing No.MH-10/AS-1841

being not satisfied with the award of compensation in a

sum of Rs.25,000/- in MVC No.2399/2011 dated

31.07.2013 on the file of Addl. MACT, Belagavi has

preferred this appeal.

4. The tribunal on contest allowed the claim petition in

part in a sum of Rs.25,000/- as compensation.

5. Wound certificate marked at Ex.P8 shows that there

a fracture on the head of pain and suffering itself claimant

is entitled to a sum of Rs.25,000/-.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3705

6. Therefore, award of compensation in a sum of

Rs.25,000/- is on the lower side. If another sum of

Rs.25,000/- is enhanced globally, same would meet the

ends of justice in the facts and circumstances of the case,

taking note of the fact that injured was inpatient only for a

day in the hospital and there is no disability.

7. Accordingly, the following :

ORDER

i) Appeal is allowed in part.

ii) As against sum of Rs.25,000/- awarded by the tribunal, claimants are entitled for Rs.50,000/- as compensation with interest at 8% per annum from the date of petition till realization.

iii) Insurance company is liable to pay the compensation.

Sd/-

JUDGE

HMB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter