Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4500 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6332
RFA No. 884 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 884 OF 2020 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
MR SRIHARI KRISHNA N
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
W/O LATE NARYANAPPA M
R/AT F-1, BBMP NO.13
PID NO. 14-81-13/5
2ND MAIN ROAD, 14TH CROSS
MUNESHWARA BLOCK
MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT
BANGALORE-560086.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. HARISH N.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. MR GANAPATHI RAJAN M
Digitally signed S/O MUTHU KUMAR
by HEMALATHA
A AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
Location: High RESIDING AT NO.189
Court of 2ND MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS
Karnataka
PRAKSH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560021.
2. KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE
APEX BANK LIMITED
PADHMANABABAGAR BRANCH
NO.67, RICM COMPLEX
PADMANABA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560070
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR H N.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R2:
NOTICE NOT ORDERED TO R1)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6332
RFA No. 884 of 2020
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 14.01.2020 PASSED ON IA No.III IN OS
No.5183/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LV ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH-56) ALLOWING THE
IA No.III FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) OF CPC FOR
REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This matter was posted before the Registrar for non-
compliance of office objections four times, none appeared
for the appellant and the office objections were not
complied with.
2. The matter was posted before the Court on
31.07.2023. On that day, a week's time was granted for
compliance of office objections. Again, the matter was
listed on 05.10.2023 for non-compliance of office
objections. On that day, two weeks time was granted to
comply with the office objections. Again, the matter was
listed on 13.02.2024. None appeared for the appellant
and the office objections were not complied with. Hence,
the matter was ordered to be listed to today under the
caption 'for dismissal'.
NC: 2024:KHC:6332
3. Even today, none appeared for the appellant in
both the sessions and the office objections are not
complied with. It appears that the appellant is not
interested in prosecuting the appeal.
4. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!