Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4384 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6064
RFA No. 1117 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1117 OF 2016 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. N. SHUBHA
D/O G NARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
FORMERLY AT R/AT NO.179
SECTOR-I, LANE NO.9
NANATH NAGAR
JAMMU THAVE 180004
STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR
ALSO AT NO.46, 2ND MAIN
2ND CROSS, MARUTHI NAGAR
MADIVALA, BANGALORE-560068
NOW AT NO.59, C-TYPE
OFFICERS QUARTERS, BEML
NAGAR, KGF-563115
...APPELLANT
Digitally signed (BY SRI. PRASANNA B R., ADVOCATE)
by HEMALATHA
A
AND:
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka 1. SRI. B.G. NARAYANA REDDY
S/O GURU MURTHY REDDY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.59, 4TH C BLOCK
8TH MAIN, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE-560045.
2. SRI B N RAKESH ROSHAN
S/O B G NARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT NO.1355, 21ST A MAIN
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6064
RFA No. 1117 of 2016
11 CROSS, HSR LAYOUT
SECTOR-I, BANGALORE-560034.
3. SMT VIDHYA
D/O B G NARAYANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT NO.59, 4TH C BLOCK
8TH MAIN, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE-560045.
4. SRI C SREEDHARAN
S/O P K PANIOKER
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS
LEGAL REPRESENTIVES
4(a) SMT K P KAMALAMMA
W/O LATE C SREEDHARAN
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
4(b) SMT. K P SREEKALA
W/O SETHUMADHAVAN
D/O LATE C SREEDHARAN
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
4(c) SMT. K SHALINI
W/O SAJAN
D.O LATE C SREEDHARAN
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
4(d) SMT. K P SREEJA
W/O BABURAJ
D/O LATE C SREEDHARN
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
DEFENDANTS 4(a) TO (d) ARE
R/A CHERIYADTH HOUSE PO
IRIMBALASSERI (VIA), NELLAYA, PALGHAT
KERALA DISTRICT 679335.
RESPONDENT 4 (a) TO (d) ARE
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:6064
RFA No. 1117 of 2016
ATTORNEY HOLDER
MR C GOPALAN, S/O LATE P K PANICKER
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.508
GARUTHAMAN PARK R.V.ROAD
BANGALORE-560004
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P V CHANDRA SHEKARA .,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3:
SMT. KRUTHKA RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4(a TO d))
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.09.2015 PASSED IN O.S
NO.6873/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH 39), DISMISSING
THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo dated 9.2.2024 stating that the appeal may be
dismissed as not pressed.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE DM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!