Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4240 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3178
CRL.P No. 100431 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100431 OF 2024 (482)
BETWEEN:
1. P.MARKANDAYYA
S/O RAJU,AGE 45 YEARS
AGE : 45 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O WARD NO.4,
HOSPETA ONI,
NEAR CHOUDAMMA TEMPEL,
ILKAL TALUK,
BAGALAKOTE DISTRICT-587101.
2. AIHOLEPPA
S/O VANDALLI,
AGE: 45 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
Digitally
signed by
MANJANNA
R/O KORADEKARA VILLAGE,
MANJANNA E
E Date:
2024.02.14
TQ: KUSTAGI,
14:33:50
+0530
DIST: KOPPAL-583231.
3. BASAYYA
S/O SHIVAYYA GURUVIN
AGE: 48 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O KORADEKARA VILLA,
TQ: KOPPAL
DIST: KOPPAL-583231.
4. VITTAL S/O VIRAPAXAPPA
AGE: AGE: 56 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3178
CRL.P No. 100431 of 2024
R/O 4TH WARD, HOSAPET GALLI,
ILKAL TALUK,
BAGALAKOTE DISTRICT-587101.
5. GIREESH B.JOSHI
AGE: 50 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O NEAR PILLE HOTEL,
MUNIRABAD
KOPPAL DISTRICT 583231.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI SANTOSH B MALLIGAWAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD RURAL POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI P.N.HATTI,HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 23.04.2019 PASSED BY THE
ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPAL IN C.C.NO.29/2019 WHEREIN
LEARNED MAGISTRATE HAS TAKEN COGNIZANCE WITH RESPECT TO
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 79 AND 80 OF KARNATAKA POLICE ACT
WITH RESPECT TO MUNIRABAD PS CRIME NO.232/2017 WITH
RESPECT TO ACCUSED NO.49, 29, 11, 43 AND 52 ARE CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:3178
CRL.P No. 100431 of 2024
ORDER
1. It is not in dispute that in respect of the
other accused in the same crime, this Court in
Crl.P.No.102476/2017, has quashed the proceedings
on the ground that the mandatory requirement of
seeking permission of the Magistrate under Section
155(2) of Cr.P.C, had not been obtained.
2. In view of the said judgment, the
proceedings initiated against the present petitioners
can also not be sustained and accordingly they are
quashed.
The Criminal petition is accordingly allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE EM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!