Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr Alexander Manohar vs Smt Kanaka Rathna
2024 Latest Caselaw 4077 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4077 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mr Alexander Manohar vs Smt Kanaka Rathna on 9 February, 2024

Author: H.T. Narendra Prasad

Bench: H.T. Narendra Prasad

                                                  -1-
                                                                NC: 2024:KHC:5613
                                                              RFA No. 606 of 2020




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD


                            REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 606 OF 2020 (PAR)


                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    MR ALEXANDER MANOHAR
                            S/O MR.H.SAMUEL CHALLA
                            AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS
                            R/A.NO.586/609, 11TH B CROSS
                            GIRINGAR 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE.


                      2.    MR HERMON EBNEZER
                            S/O H.SAMUEL CHALLA
                            AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
                            R/A.NO.61, 2ND CROSS, 8TH MAIN
                            BAGEGOWDA LAYOUT
                            DODDAKALLASANDRA POST
Digitally signed by         BANGALORE-560062
HEMALATHA A                                                         ...APPELLANTS
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
                      (BY SRI. MOHAN RANGAM V A.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT])


                      AND:


                      1.    SMT KANAKA RATHNA
                            SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HER LR'S
                          -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:5613
                                     RFA No. 606 of 2020




1(a) SMT. ELIZABETH
     D/O.LATE MR.AMRUTH BHASKR CHALLA
     AND SMT. KANAKA RATHNA
     AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
     R/A.N.R.MOHALLA, MYSURU.

2.   SMT. STELLA YESHODA
     D/O.MR.H.SAMUEL CHELLA
     AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
     R/A.KALAPPA LAYOUT
     VIBUTHIPURA, BANGALORE.

3.   SMT GRACE PADMAVATHI
     SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY
     HER LRS

3(a) SMT.MARY SALOMY
     W/O MR.HEMANTH KUMAR
     KPTCL 220/661/11 KV
     RECEIVING STATION QRTS.
     SIMANAHALLI POST
     KANAKAPURA ROAD
     BANGALORE-560062.

3(b) MR JACOB RAVI KUMAR
     R/A NO.U29,KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA
     1ST MAIN ROAD
     BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR
     BANGALORE-560023.

3(c) SMT ALICE SUJAY
     R/A.NO.35, 1ST CROSS
     RAMESH NAGAR
     (BEHIND HELICOPTER FACTOR)
     BANGALORE-560037.

3(d) MR MICHEL YESU PRAKASH
     R/A NO.4/2, 1ST MAIN
     13TH CROSS, KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA
                              -3-
                                          NC: 2024:KHC:5613
                                        RFA No. 606 of 2020




       BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR
       BANGALORE.

3(e) MR SAMUEL PRASAD
     R/A NO. U29, 1ST MAIN
     KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA
     BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR
     BANGALORE-560023.

3(f) MR JOSEPH PRASANNA KUMAR
     R/A.NO.U 29, 1ST MAIN
     KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA
     BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR
     BANGALORE-560023.

4.     SMT AGNES ROSE
       W/O.MR.HONNAPPA
       AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
       R/A NO.121, 5TH CROSS
       BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR
       KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA
       BANGALORE-560023.

5.     SMT LOUISA G C
       W/O.LATE MR.JOSEPH B BAGALKOT
       AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
       R/A.NO.905/2, 3RD CROSS
       4TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR
       BANGALORE-560040.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
       THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41
RULE 1 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 17.10.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.10320/2005 ON THE
FILE    OF   THE   XXIX   ADDITIONAL   CITY   CIVIL   JUDGE,
BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.

       THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE

COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                             -4-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:5613
                                         RFA No. 606 of 2020




                        JUDGMENT

When the matter was posted before the Registrar for

non-compliance of office objections, for the third time,

office objections were not complied with.

2. On 12.09.2023, the matter was posted before the

Court for non-compliance of office objections. On that day,

finally, two weeks time was granted for compliance of

office objections, failing which, it was ordered that the

appeal stands dismissed for default. Thereafter, the office

objections were not complied with.

3. Today, the matter is posted before the Court for

non-compliance of office objections for the fifth time, none

appeared for the appellant in both the sessions and the

office objections were also not complied with.

4. In view of the order dated 12.09.2023, the

appeal stands dismissed for default.

Sd/-

JUDGE

CM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter