Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. J.K. Maresh vs Honnur Sab S/O Mobusab
2024 Latest Caselaw 3149 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3149 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. J.K. Maresh vs Honnur Sab S/O Mobusab on 1 February, 2024

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                                -1-
                                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:2277
                                                         MFA No. 101470 of 2016




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                             BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.101470 OF 2016 (MV-I)
                   BETWEEN:
                   SRI. J.K. MARESH S/O. J. MALLIKARJUNA,
                   AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
                   R/O: OLD MALAPANAGUDI,
                   HOSPET TALUK, DIST:BALLARI,
                   NOW R/O:BELAGAL CROSS,
                   BALLARI-591123.
                                                                     ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, ADVOCATE)
                   AND:
                   1.   HONNUR SAB S/O. MABUSAB,
                        AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC:DRIVER-CUM-
                        OWNER OF AUTO MINIDOOR
                        BEARING REGN. NO.KA-35/7940,
                        R/O:12TH WARD, MEENUGUR ONI,
                        KAMALAPUR, HOSPET TALUKA,
                        BALLARI DISTRICT-591036.
                   2.   M/S. SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE
Digitally signed
by SAMREEN
AYUB
                        COMPANY LIMITED, BY ITS
DESHNUR
Date:
                        BRANCH MANAGER, E-8,EPIPRICO,
2024.02.03
12:57:47 +0530
                        SITAPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
                        STATE-411043.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. ANUSHA SANGAMI, ADVOCATE FOR
                       SRI. S.K. KAYAKAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
                       R1 SERVED)
                         THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
                   SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, AGAINST THE
                   JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 25.02.2014 PASSED IN MVC
                   NO.40/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT
                   CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-II, BALLARI, PATRLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
                   PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
                   COMPENSATION.
                                -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:2277
                                        MFA No. 101470 of 2016




     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:


                           JUDGMENT

Heard Sri T.Hanumareddy, advocate for appellant and

Smt.Anusha Sangami advocate representing Sri

S.K.Kayakamath, advocate for respondent No.2.

2. Though the matter is listed for orders, with the consent of

the parties, same is taken up for final disposal.

3. Claimant is in appeal challenging the adequacy of the

compensation awarded by the Member, MACT-II, Bellary, in

MVC No.40/2013 dated 25.02.2014.

4. The claimant filed petition under Section 166 of the

M.V.Act seeking grant of compensation for the accidental

injuries sustained by him on 31.10.2011 at 8.45 am when he

was travelling from Hospet bus stand to attend coolie work,

whereby he met with an accident involving auto bearing

registration No.KA-35/7949.

5. The claim petition, on contest came to be allowed in part

by granting compensation in a sum of Rs.73,942/- with interest

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2277

at 6% per annum fastening the liability on the owner of the

auto rickshaw taking note of the fact that the auto rickshaw

was not insured as on the date of the accident and exonerating

the liability of the insurance company.

6. Being aggrieved by the inadequacy in awarding

compensation, claimant is in appeal.

7. Sri Hanumareddy, advocate for the appellant, reiterating

the grounds urged in the appeal memorandum, contended that

the Tribunal has not properly appreciated the material evidence

on record and sought for suitable enhancement.

8. Smt.Anusha Sangami, advocate for the Insurance

Company submitted that suitable orders be passed, as there is

no liability on the Insurance Company.

9. The owner of the auto rickshaw, though served with

notice, remained absent.

10. Taking note of the fact that the accident is of the year

2011 and there is no permanent disability though disability

certificate is marked at Ex.P.7, enhancement of compensation

NC: 2024:KHC-D:2277

from Rs.73,942/- to Rs.1,25,000/- would meet the ends of

justice, as the medical bill itself is in a sum of Rs.56,000/-.

11. Further, the Tribunal has not properly assessed the

monthly income of the claimant in order to assess the loss of

income during laid up period. So also on the other heads,

compensation awarded is on the lower side.

12. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is allowed in part.



          (ii)    As against Rs.73,942/- awarded by the
                  Tribunal,    claimant       is   entitled   to

compensation in a sum of Rs.1,25,000/-

with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization, less the interest for delayed period of 706 days in filing the appeal.

(iii) Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

kcm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter