Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3118 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1206
RSA No. 200179 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 200179 OF 2020 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
MOHINSAB S/O MOHD. ASIF SAB,
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: PETTY BUSINESS,
R/O: MASKI, TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584101.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A R TARANATH, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
1. REHMAT BEE
W/O MOHD. YAKUBSAB,
AGE: 63 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
LUCYGRACE ABDUL KHADERSAB
Location:
HIGH
S/O MOHD. YAKUBSAB
COURT OF DECEASED BY HIS LRS.
KARNATAKA
2. KAISAR BANU
W/O LATE ABDUL KHADARSAB,
AGE: 54 YEARS,
3. AFRIN BEGUM
D/O LATE ABDUL KHADAR SAB,
AGE: 30 YEARS,
4. NAZIA BEGUM
D/O LATE ABDUL KHADAR SAB,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1206
RSA No. 200179 of 2020
AGE: 28 YEARS,
5. MOHD. YAKUBSAB
S/O LATE ABDUL KHADAR SAB,
AGE: 26 YEARS,
6. MOHD. YASINNSAB
S/O LATE ABDUL KHADAR SAB,
AGE: 24 YEARS,
ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS,
R/O: MASKI VILLAGE,
TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584101.
7. USMANSAB S/O MOHD. YAKUBSAB,
AGE: 43 YEARS,
8. NAZIRSAB S/O MOHD. YAKUBSAB,
AGE: 38 YEARS,
9. K. SIDRAMAPPA
S/O VIRUPANNA HOOVINABHAVI,
AGE: 69 YEARS,
10. SHAMSHAD BEGUM D/O MOHD.
ASIF SAB,
AGE: 63 YEARS,
11. DASTAGIRSAB S/O ABDUL KHADAR
KHAJI,
AGE: 41 YEARS,
ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS,
R/O: MASKI, TQ: LINGASUGUR,
DIST: RAICHUR-584101.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHIVANAND PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-8 & 11)
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC,
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1206
RSA No. 200179 of 2020
27.11.2013 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
LINGASUGUR IN O.S. NO.267/2006 TO THE EXTENT OF
DISMISSING THE SUIT IN RESPECT OF SUIT ITEM NO.6 OF
LANDED PROPERTY AND SUIT ITEM NO.7 OF HOUSE PROPERTY
AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
12.02.2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL.DIST. &
SESSIONS JUDGE AT RAICHUR IN R.A.NO.01/2014.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. None appear for the appellant. Learned counsel appearing
for the respondent is present.
2. There was no representation made on behalf of the
appellant on the last occasion and no representation has been
made today also.
3. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
sac
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!