Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19402 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
MFA No. 23569 of 2011
C/W MFA.CROB No. 785 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 23569 OF 2011
C/W
MFA CROSS OBJ NO. 785 OF 2012
IN MFA NO.23569/2011
BETWEEN:
1. THE MANAGING DIRECTORS,
N.W.K.R.T.C, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI.
2. THE SELF INSURANCE FUND,
N.W.K.R.T.C., GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. I. C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. ISHWAR S/O. MALLESHAPPA
VAKKUNDA, AGE: 41 YEARS,
OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: SHUKRUVARPETH,
DHARWAD.
...RESPONDENT
YASHAVANT (BY SMT. VIJAYLAXMI M. N AND SRI. S.M. NADAF, ADVOCATE)
NARAYANKAR
THIS MFA FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MVC ACT, 1988, AGAINST
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:23-02-2011 PASSED IN
KARNATAKA
MVC.NO.571/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE III-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND MACT, DHARWAD AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND AWARD DATED 23.02.2011 PASSED IN MVC 571/2008 ON BY
THE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MACT, DHARWAD, BY
ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
MFA No. 23569 of 2011
C/W MFA.CROB No. 785 of 2012
IN MFA CROB NO.785/2012
BETWEEN:
ISHWAR S/O. MALLESHAPPA VAKKUND,
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE,
R/O. SHUKRAVARPETH DHARWAD.
...CROSS OBJECTOR
(BY SMT. VIJAYLAXMI M. N AND SRI. S.M. NADAF, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. THE M. D, NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD,
HUBLI.
2. THE SELF INSURANCE FUND,
NWKRTC GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. I. C. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA CROB FILED U/O 41 RULE 22 OF CPC., AGAINST
JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE COURT OF II ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND DHARWAD AND MACT I/C III ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DHARWAD IN MVC NO.571/2008 DATED
23.02.2011 AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION BY ALLOWING THIS
CROSS OBJECTION AND DISMISS THE MFA NO.23569/2011 IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL AND MFA CROB COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
MFA No. 23569 of 2011
C/W MFA.CROB No. 785 of 2012
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement
of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MVC
No.571/2008 dated 23.02.2011 passed by the III Addl. Senior
Civil Judge and MACT, Dharwad.
2. The factual matrix of the case is that on 07.05.2008
at 07.45 p.m. after completion of work, the appellant/injured
was riding his motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-25Y-6180
with his friend as pillion rider near Tarihal By-pass, the vehicle
was parked to the left side. At that time, N.W.K.R.T.C bus
bearing No.KA-22-F-1457 plying from Dharwad towards Gabbur
By-pass and was driven in high speed, in rash and negligent
manner and in an attempt to overtake another vehicle, dashed
the petitioner and the petitioner sustained grievous injuries and
disability. The appellant filed claim petition and the Tribunal
considering the evidence of PW1 and 2 and documents at
Exs.P1 to P17 has awarded compensation of Rs.2,20,600/- with
interest at 6% p.a., holding the appellants liable to pay the
compensation amount.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
3. Being aggrieved by the said award of compensation
by the Tribunal-the appellant/Corporation has filed this appeal
on the ground that the compensation awarded is on higher
side. The respondent/claimant has filed cross objection on the
ground that compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on lower
side and sought enhancement of the compensation.
4. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused
the impugned judgment and the trial Court records.
5. The accident occurred due to rash and negligent
driving of the bus driver of N.W.K.R.T.C., has not been
challenged. The quantum of compensation awarded by the
Tribunal, has been questioned in this appeal. The injury
certificate of the claimant is at Ex.P-12. The injury is noted in
Ex.P-12 are as under:
i. Diffuse tenderness rt. Leg and ankle joint.
ii. Antalgie gait. iii. Right knee movement is restricted by 10%. iv. 80% restiction of right ankle joint. v. Right lower limb is short by 4 cms.
6. PW-2 is the Doctor who has issued the said
disability certificate at Ex.P-17. The X-rays produced at
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
Exs.P14 to P16 indicates that the right leg with ankle joint
shows malunited fracture of Distal end of tibia and fibula with
arthritic changes on ankle joint. PW-2-Doctor who has issued
Ex.P17-disability certificate has stated that respondent/claimant
was found with 4 cms shortening of right leg by 15% and
moderate right ankle movement by 25% partially disability on
his right lower limbs. Considering the said documents, the
Tribunal has rightly assessed the disability at 14%.
7. The respondent/claimant was aged about 38 years
and he was agriculturist and the same can be seen in Ex.P11-
RTC. Hence, considering the same, it is clear that he had
income from agricultural work. The petitioner was only earning
member of the family, since his father expired and death
certificate of the father is at Ex.P-10. The Tribunal has taken
monthly income of the respondent/claimant at Rs.4,000/- and
calculated yearly income at Rs.48,000/-. The notional income
has fixed by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority
(KSLSA) for the year 2008 is Rs.4,250/- per month. The
Tribunal ought to have taken the said aspect into consideration
and calculated his yearly income. Therefore, the income of the
respondent/claimant is Rs.51,000/-(4,250x12). In respect of
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
the disability, the Tribunal has taken into consideration the
decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Rani Gupta &
Ors. V/s M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., AIR
(2009) SC 3226 14. Therefore, the yearly income of
Rs.51,000/- with disability of 14% would be Rs.7,140/- and the
multiplier 14 is applied and it comes to Rs.99,960/-
(4250 x 12 x 14 x 14%).
8. Considering, the injuries sustained by the
respondent/claimant, the Tribunal has rightly awarded a sum of
Rs.40,000/- towards Pain and sufferings. The Tribunal has
awarded a sum of Rs.35,000/- towards loss of amenities.
Considering the lot of inconvenience caused to the
respondent/claimant, it is proper. The Tribunal considering the
documents produced, has rightly awarded the medical
expenses of Rs.21,520/- and also rightly awarded Rs.6,000/-
towards diet-cum-conveyance expenses. The Tribunal
considering that the respondent/claimant was admitted for a
period of nearly 4 months has rightly awarded loss of income
during laid-up period in a sum of Rs.24,000/-. Considering all
these aspects, the respondent/claimant is entitled for
compensation under the following heads:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
Sl. Heads Rs.
No.
1. Future loss of income on account of 99,960/- disability
2. Pain and sufferings 40,000/-
3. Loss of amenities 35,000/-
4. Medical Expenses 21,250/-
5. Diet-cum-conveyance expenses 6,000/-
6. Loss of income during laid up period 24,000/-
Total 2,26,210/-
9. The Tribunal has awarded total compensation of
Rs.2,20,600/-. Therefore, the respondent/claimant is entitled to
enhanced compensation of Rs.5,610/- (2,26,210 - 2,20,600).
10. In view of the above, the following:
ORDER
i. The appeal of the appellants/Corporation is dismissed and Cross objection filed by respondent/ claimant is partly-allowed. ii. The respondent/claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of Rs.5,610/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. Since, the appeal is of the year 2011 the respondent/claimant is entitled to release of entire enhanced compensation with interest.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10974
iii. The amount of compensation deposited by the appellant/Corporation before this Court is ordered to be sent to the Tribunal.
Sd/-
(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
RKM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!