Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19320 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:30792
RSA No. 227 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.227 OF 2014
(DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNISWAMY REDDY
S/O LATE SRI CHIKKARAMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI
BANGARPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
2. SRI ASHOK REDDY
S/O SRI MUNISWAMY REDDY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
Digitally KASABA HOBLI, BANGARAPET TALUK
signed by R KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
DEEPA ...APPELLANTS
Location: (BY SRI. PATTABIRAMAN C, ADVOCATE)
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA AND:
1. SRI R. YAMA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI DODDARAMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, BANGARAPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
2. SRI MUNIRAMA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI DODDARAMAREDDY
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:30792
RSA No. 227 of 2014
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, BANGARAPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
3. SRI Y SHANKAR REDDY
S/O SRI R YAMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, BANGARAPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
4. SRI Y NAGI REDDY
S/O SRI R YAMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, BANGARAPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
5. SRI Y NARAYANA REDDY
S/O SRI R YAMAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT PARAVANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, BANGARAPET TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V THUKARAM RAO, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. VASANTHA KUMAR K.M., ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 21.9.2013 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.127/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER,
FAST TRACK COURT, K.G.F., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND
SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD
21.11.2012 PASSED IN OS.NO.140/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, K.G.F.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:30792
RSA No. 227 of 2014
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo
seeking permission to withdraw the appeal and to dismiss
the appeal as not pressed.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not
pressed.
SD/-
(ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!