Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9829 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6139-DB
WA No. 100063 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
WRIT APPEAL NO.100063 OF 2024 (S-R)
BETWEEN:
SRI N.S. HADLI S/O. SANNA BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC: EX-MANAGER,
NO.13, NEAR SIDDAROODMATH, AT AND POST-
ALAGAWADI, TQ. NAVALAGUND, DIST.DHARWAD-582208.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI MADHUSOODHANA P.N., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI A.R. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMIN BANK,
HEAD OFFICE, P.B. NO.111, BELAGAVI ROAD,
DHARWAD-580008, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN.
2. KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMIN BANK,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HEAD OFFICE,
Digitally signed P.B. NO.111, BELAGAVI ROAD, DHARWAD-580008.
by SAMREEN
AYUB DESHNUR
3. GENERAL MANAGER,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMIN BANK, HEAD OFFICE,
KARNATAKA P.B. NO.111, BELAGAVI ROAD, DHARWAD-580008.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH
COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER OF LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 31.01.2024 PASSED
IN W.P.NO.100196/2022 BY ALLOWING THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS
TO RELEASE ALL RETIREMENT BENEFITS ALONG WITH INTEREST AT
18% FROM THE DATE PAYABLE TO TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT.
THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, M.I.ARUN, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6139-DB
WA No. 100063 of 2024
JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed against the order passed by the
learned Single in Writ Petition No.100196/2022 (S-R).
2. The appellant was working as a Manager in the
1st respondent Bank. On the ground that he extended the
loan by violating the KYC norms because of which loans
were sanctioned to the persons who were not residents of
the addresses which they gave to the Bank and also the
properties mortgaged were not in existence and the loans
were not repaid, which caused huge financial loss to the
Bank. Disciplinary action has been initiated against the
appellant. The appellant has been terminated from the
service. It is also submitted that criminal prosecution is
also initiated against the appellant.
3. In the writ petition, the appellant herein has
challenged the disciplinary proceedings initiated by the
Bank. On the ground that writ petition has been filed after
lapse of around six years from the date of cause of action
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6139-DB
arising to the appellant herein, the writ petition has been
dismissed.
4. Admittedly, there is no satisfactory explanation
given by the appellant in respect of inordinate delay. For
that reason, we do not find any error in the order passed
by the learned Single Judge and the writ appeal is hereby
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
CKK, CT: UMD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!