Smt. Sushma W/O Sham Patil vs Raju S/O Vitthal Patil
2024 Latest Caselaw 9825 Kant

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Sushma W/O Sham Patil vs Raju S/O Vitthal Patil on 4 April, 2024

                                             -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:6110
                                                      RFA No. 100434 of 2017




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                   DHARWAD BENCH

                         DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                          BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA

                 REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100434/2017(PA/DE/IN)

                BETWEEN:

                1.   SMT. SUSHMA
                     W/O. SHAM PATIL,
                     AGE: 42 YEARS,
                     OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEWIFE,
                     R/O: GURUPRASAD BUILDING,
                     NEAR GADGIL BUS STOP,
                     ANGOL ROAD, BELAGAVI - 06.

                2.   APPAJI
                     S/O. SHAM PATIL,
                     AGE: 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
                     R/O: GURUPRASAD BUILDING,
                     NEAR GADGIL BUS STOP,
                     ANGOL ROAD, BELAGAVI - 06.
                                                                ...APPELLANTS
Digitally       (BY SRI SHREEVATSA HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
signed by
MANJANNA
E               AND:
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
                1.   RAJU
                     S/O. VITTHAL PATIL,
                     AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                     R/O: NEAR GADGIL BUS STOP,
                     ANGOL ROAD, BELAGAVI - 06.

                2.   RAM
                     S/O. VITTHAL PATIL,
                     AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                     R/O: GURUPRASAD BUILDING,
                     NEAR GADGIL BUS STOP,
                     ANGOL ROAD, BELAGAVI - 06.
                               -2-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:6110
                                      RFA No. 100434 of 2017




3.   SMT. SHAKUNTALA VITTHAL PATIL,
     AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
     R/O: GURUPRASAD BUILDING,
     NEAR GADGIL BUS STOP,
     ANGOL ROAD, BELAGAVI-06.

4.   SMT.NANDA SUDHAM GARGOTI,
     AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
     R/O: GANGA NIVAS,
     SHUKRAWAR PETH,
     BESIDE ISCKON,
     TILAKWADI - 06.

5.   SMT. ARUN RAJU PATIL,
     AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
     R/O: 4760, JIJAI BUILDING,
     NEW GOOD SHED ROAD,
     BELAGAVI - 06.

6.   SMT. SUBHADRA @ INDU GAVADU PATIL,
     AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
     R/O: BHUTTEWADI, TAL: KHANAPUR,
     NOW AT GURUPRASAD BUILDING,
     ANGOL ROAD, BELAGAVI - 06.

7.   SIDDAGOUDA PARAGOUDA PATIL,
     AGE: 66 YEARS,
     OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE,
     R/O: AT PO. YADGUD, TAL: HUKKERI,
     DIST: BELAGAVI.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS


        THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
CODE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
DATED 28.02.2017 AND DECREE DATED 09.03.2017 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.158/2010 BY THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM., BELAGAVI AND DECREE THE SUIT OF THE APPELLANTS AND
ETC.,


        THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                -3-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:6110
                                       RFA No. 100434 of 2017




                          JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No

representation.

2. The office has raised so many office objections

and the same were not complied with. Pursuant to the

same, the appeal was came to be dismissed vide order

dated 25.09.2019. In-spite of that, office objections are

not complied with.

3. It appears that the appellants are not interested

in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is

dismissed.

SD/-

JUDGE

EM/CT-ASC