Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9463 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:13130
WP No. 3210 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 3210 OF 2024 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI N G MAHADEVAIAH
S/O LATE SRI GURUCHENNABASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 43, 9TH MAIN,
M C LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU 560040
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARISH N.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAKRUPA PARK WEST,
T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU 560020.
...RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA.,ADVOCATE)
KIRAN
KUMAR R
Location: THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
HIGH AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
COURT OF
KARNATAKA DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATION DATED 17.05.2023 AND REPRESENTATION
DATED 10.08.2023, PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C
AND E TO THE WRIT PETITION AND FURTHER DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO RECONVEY THE SITE BEARING NO.19 AS PER
SECTION 38(c) OF BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ACT OR TO ALLOT ANY ALTERNATIVE SITE AS PER THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXVII
ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU IN O.S.NO.3694/2002
DATED 13.11.2015 PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A
TO THE WP
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:13130
WP No. 3210 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is to direct the
respondent to consider the representations dated
17.05.2023 and 10.08.2023 by which the petitioner is
seeking for a direction to the respondents to re-convey the
site bearing No.19 or, in the alternative, grant an alternate
site, as decreed in his favour in O.S. No.3694/2002.
2. It is also stated that this suit was challenged by filing
an appeal in R.F.A. No.1307/2016 and the same was
dismissed for non-prosecution on 10.04.2023, and
thereafter, applications have been made asking the
Bengaluru Development Authority to comply with the
decree of the Trial Court.
3. In view of the above, it would be appropriate to
direct the respondents to consider the representations
made by the petitioner for complying with the judgment
and decree passed in O.S. No.3694/2002 and as confirmed
NC: 2024:KHC:13130
in R.F.A. No.1037/2016 within a period of two months
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HNM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!