Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maruti S/O Appanna Wagyagol vs The Inspector General Of Registration
2024 Latest Caselaw 9447 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9447 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Maruti S/O Appanna Wagyagol vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 1 April, 2024

Author: Ravi V.Hosmani

Bench: Ravi V.Hosmani

                                                   -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC-D:5941
                                                           WP No. 107627 of 2023




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                                  DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2024
                                                 BEFORE
                                THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
                              WRIT PETITION NO.107627 OF 2023 (GM-ST/RN)
                       BETWEEN:
                       MARUTI S/O. APPANNA WAGYAGOL,
                       AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                       R/O. ARBYANWADI VILLAGE,
                       TQ: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
                                                                        ...PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI VIDYASHANKAR G. DALAWAI, ADVOCATE)
                       AND:
                       1.   THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
                            AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS,
                            KANDAAYA BHAVAN, 8TH FLOOR,
                            K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560009.

                       2.   THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR,
                            DISTRICT REGISTRATION OFFICER BUILDING,
                            D.C.COMPOUND, BELAGAVI-590001.

                       3.   THE SUB REGISTRAR,
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI                   SUB REGISTRATION OFFICER BUILDING,
Digitally signed by
                            SADALAGA, TQ: CHIKKODI,
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN KATTIMANI
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
                            DIST: BELAGAVI-590001.
DHARWAD BENCH
Date: 2024.04.04
11:44:33 +0530                                                        ...RESPONDENTS
                       (BY SRI MADANMOHAN M. KHANNUR, AGA)
                            THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
                       OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
                       CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT BEARING
                       NO.R.G.N/11/2022-23 DATED 18-05-2022 ISSUED BY THE
                       RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-C; ISSUE A WRIT OF
                       MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO REGISTER THE
                       DECREE DATED 24-03-2009 PASSED BY THE COURT OF I ADDL.
                       CIVIL JUDGE (JR DN) AND JMFC, CHIKODI IN SUIT O.S.NO.
                       162/2008 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
                                 -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:5941
                                          WP No. 107627 of 2023




      THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                             ORDER

1. This writ petition is filed seeking for following

reliefs.

i. Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the impugned endorsement bearing no.

R.G.N/11/2022-23 dated 18-05-2022 issued by the Respondent no.3 vide Annexure-C.

ii. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to register the Decree dated 24-03-2009 passed by the Court of I Addl. Civil Judge (JR DN) and JMFC, Chikodi in suit OS no.162/2008 vide Annexure-A.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that

petitioner had filed O.S.no.162/2008 against one Basavant

Shivmurti Kamble and Hounsaraj Shivmurti Kamble for

declaration of his title by adverse possession in respect of

land bearing Sy.no.528/1B measuring 1-acre 21-guntas

out of total extent of 3-acres, 3-guntas situated at Examba

village in Chikkodi taluk etc. It was submitted, said suit

came to be decreed on 24.03.2009 as per judgment and

decree at Annexure-A. When after securing certified copy

of judgment, petitioner made an application to respondent

for registration of decree along with application for

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5941

condonation of delay, impugned endorsement at

Annexure-C dated 18.05.2022 came to be issued. It was

submitted, under similar circumstances, High Court of

Judicature at Madras in W.P.no.15881/2022 disposed of on

24.06.2022 had interpreted provisions of Registration Act,

1908 (for short 'Act') and held in case of Court decree,

Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration. On said grounds,

reliefs are sought.

3. On other hand Sri Madanmohan Khannur,

learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents

though submitted there was belated approach by

petitioner for registration of decree instead of approaching

within four months, he is unable to contradict ratio in

judgment at Annexure-D.

4. In view of above, petitioner would be entitled to

relief. Hence, following decision in W.P.no.15881/2022

passed by High Court of Judicature of Madras dated

24.06.2022 produced at Annexure-C, writ petition stands

allowed.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5941

Respondents no.2 and 3 are directed to register

decree, as soon as same is presented before them by

petitioner after calling upon petitioner to comply with

necessary formalities, if any.

Sd/-

JUDGE

AM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter