Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10479 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:15131
MFA No. 4468 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4468 OF 2015(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
H.K.SHIVEGOWDA
S/O LATE KENCHEGOWDA,
PRESENTLY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 11, NEW NO.6,
6TH MAIN, SHIVANAGARA
BENGALURU-560 010.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. SMT.GANGAMMA
W/O LATE SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
2. NAGARATHNA
Digitally signed by D/O LATE SHIVANNA,
THEJASKUMAR N AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 3. KAMALA
D/O LATE SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
4. MANJUNATHA
S/O LATE SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
5. SMT. DEVIRAMMA
W/O LATE BORAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:15131
MFA No. 4468 of 2015
THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 5 ARE
THE RESIDENTS OF MALLAGHATTA
BEGUR POST, KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.
6. SRI. KANDASWAMY
S/O NACHIMUTHU CHETTIAR,
MAJOR, AGED MAJOR,
GUNNY MERCHANT, SOCIETY ROAD,
HASSAN-573 201.
7. THE BRANCH MANAGER,
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
NO.342/1, SAMPIGE ROAD,
NEAR 11TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM,
BENGALURU-560 003.
8. SRI. SHIVEGOWDA
S/O GIDDEGOWDA,
AGED MAJOR,
RAJAGATTA, HASSAN-573 201.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.T.VASANTH KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. A. RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR R7;
R5-AGAINST APPEAL IS ABATED V/ODATED:11.03.2022;
R6 AND R8-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:01.04.2008
PASSED IN MVC NO.867/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE(SR.DN), MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MACT,
RAMANAGARA.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:15131
MFA No. 4468 of 2015
ORDER
Though matter called twice, there is no representation on
behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video
conferencing.
Sri.H.T.Vasanth Kumar., learned counsel for respondents
1 to 4 has appeared through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is
filed in the year 2015. Now we are in the month of April 2024.
The appeal is pending from nine years.
As already noted above, though matter called twice, there
is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either
personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the
appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence,
the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE TKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!