Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Tirumala Constructions vs Smt. M Mamatha
2024 Latest Caselaw 10406 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10406 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S Tirumala Constructions vs Smt. M Mamatha on 15 April, 2024

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                                  -1-
                                                               NC: 2024:KHC:14960
                                                             WP No. 6132 of 2024




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                 DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                                BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                                 WRIT PETITION NO.6132 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   M/S TIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS
                           A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM
                           OFFICE AT NO.326,
                           5TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS
                           4TH STAGE
                           VINAYAKA LAYOUT
                           NAGARABHAVI
                           BENGALURU - 560 072
                           REPRESENTED BY ITS
                           MANAGING PARTNERS
                           MR. MOHAN R AND
                           MR. PRAVEEN M.

                      2.   MR. MOHAN R.
                           S/O LATE RANGANATHAN
                           AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
                           OFFICE AT NO.326,
                           5TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS
Digitally signed by        4TH STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT
VANDANA S                  NAGARABHAVI
Location: High
Court of Karnataka         BENGALURU - 560 072.

                      3.   MR. PRAVEEN MOHAN
                           S/O MOHAN R
                           AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
                           OFFICE AT NO.326,
                           5TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS
                           4TH STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT
                           NAGARABHAVI
                           BENGALURU - 560 072.

                                                                   ...PETITIONERS
                      (BY SRI. CHETHAN KUMAR K.,ADVOCATE)
                                 -2-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:14960
                                            WP No. 6132 of 2024




AND:

SMT. M. MAMATHA
W/O R. MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NO. 23,
HIG A SECTOR
2ND MAIN ROAD,
YALAHANKA
BENGALURU - 560 064.
                                                   ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.K. VASANTH, ADVOCATE)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03.02.2024 PASSED ON THE
JURISDICTION IN COM.EX.586/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE
LEARNED LXXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AT    BANGALORE     (CCH-86)   VIDE   ANNEXURE-E    AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISSED THE EXECUTION PETITION FILED BY
THE FILED BY THE RESPONDENT.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                              ORDER

This petition is directed against the impugned order dated

03.02.2024 passed in Ex.586/2023 on the file of LXXXV Addl. City

Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore. When the matter was posted

before this Court on 11.03.2024, the following order was passed:

"Issue emergent notice to the respondent returnable by 15th April 2024.

In the meanwhile, further proceedings in Com.Ex.Petition No.586/2023 pending on the file of the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-86), are

NC: 2024:KHC:14960

stayed subject to petitioners depositing 25% of the amount covered under the settlement entered into between the petitioners and respondent before the District Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru Urban. The amount shall be deposited before the Executing Court on or before 10th April 2024.

Liberty is reserved in favour of respondent to seek vacation/modification of this Order.

Two weeks' time is granted to comply with the office objections."

2. The petitioners - judgment debtors have not complied the

aforesaid order and have not deposited the amount as directed by

this Court. Under these circumstances nothing further survives in

the present petition which deserves to be dismissed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to comply

with the directions issued by this Court. However, in view of the

objections and submission of the learned counsel for the

respondent that sufficient opportunity has been granted in favour of

the petitioners and since no amount has been deposited by the

petitioners and also having regard to the impugned order which

does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity warranting

interference of this Court in exercise of its powers under Article 227

of the Constitution of India, as held by the Apex Court in the case

NC: 2024:KHC:14960

of Radhey Shyam Vs. Chhabi Nath reported in (2015) 5 SCC

423, I do not find any merit in the petition and the same is hereby

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

DHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter